DOJ-OGR-00011382.json 4.6 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "2",
  4. "document_number": "726",
  5. "date": "07/13/22",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 726 Filed 07/13/22 Page 2 of 3\nThe Court's Chambers also received an email from Defense counsel inquiring whether to docket three joint letters regarding jury strikes that were previously filed with the Court, but not docketed. Because docketing the letters would not undermine the important interest of protecting juror anonymity and privacy, the parties are ORDERED to docket the three letters on or before 12:00 p.m. on Friday, July 15, 2022.\nFinally, to ensure a complete record, the Court has identified four additional documents that have not previously been docketed nor subject of a sealing request:\n- November 19, 2021 Administrator Feldman's Motion to Quash Defendant's Rule 17(c)(3) subpoena, with exhibits\n- November 22, 2021 Defendant's Response to Motions to Quash Defendant's Rule 17(c)(3) subpoena\n- December 6, 2021 Jane's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Call Counsel to Testify\n- December 15, 2021 Jane's Opposition to Defendant's December 13, 2021 Motion to Call Counsel to Testify\nThe parties are ORDERED to confer with each other and counsel for the relevant movants and indicate on or before 12:00 p.m. on Friday, July 15, 2022, whether there are any requests to seal or redact the outstanding documents. Any documents not subject to a sealing request must be docketed on ECF by that same date. Any proposed redactions must be justified by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.\nThis resolves Dkt. No. 698.\nSO ORDERED.\n2\nDOJ-OGR-00011382",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 726 Filed 07/13/22 Page 2 of 3",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "The Court's Chambers also received an email from Defense counsel inquiring whether to docket three joint letters regarding jury strikes that were previously filed with the Court, but not docketed. Because docketing the letters would not undermine the important interest of protecting juror anonymity and privacy, the parties are ORDERED to docket the three letters on or before 12:00 p.m. on Friday, July 15, 2022.",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "Finally, to ensure a complete record, the Court has identified four additional documents that have not previously been docketed nor subject of a sealing request:",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "- November 19, 2021 Administrator Feldman's Motion to Quash Defendant's Rule 17(c)(3) subpoena, with exhibits\n- November 22, 2021 Defendant's Response to Motions to Quash Defendant's Rule 17(c)(3) subpoena\n- December 6, 2021 Jane's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Call Counsel to Testify\n- December 15, 2021 Jane's Opposition to Defendant's December 13, 2021 Motion to Call Counsel to Testify",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "The parties are ORDERED to confer with each other and counsel for the relevant movants and indicate on or before 12:00 p.m. on Friday, July 15, 2022, whether there are any requests to seal or redact the outstanding documents. Any documents not subject to a sealing request must be docketed on ECF by that same date. Any proposed redactions must be justified by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "This resolves Dkt. No. 698.",
  40. "position": "bottom"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "SO ORDERED.",
  45. "position": "bottom"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "2",
  50. "position": "footer"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011382",
  55. "position": "footer"
  56. }
  57. ],
  58. "entities": {
  59. "people": [
  60. "Feldman",
  61. "Jane"
  62. ],
  63. "organizations": [
  64. "Second Circuit"
  65. ],
  66. "locations": [
  67. "Onondaga"
  68. ],
  69. "dates": [
  70. "July 15, 2022",
  71. "November 19, 2021",
  72. "November 22, 2021",
  73. "December 6, 2021",
  74. "December 15, 2021",
  75. "December 13, 2021",
  76. "07/13/22"
  77. ],
  78. "reference_numbers": [
  79. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  80. "726",
  81. "698",
  82. "DOJ-OGR-00011382"
  83. ]
  84. },
  85. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  86. }