mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011573.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "54",
    "document_number": "737",
    "date": "07/22/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 54 of 101 54 M6SQmax1 assets, and then reported $22 million in assets in support of the December 2020 bail application. The claim now of an inability to pay the fine, as I understand it, at the same time in which the defense has not provided documentation of her marriage or the purported pending divorce settlement. So I am unpersuaded based on the balance of facts that the defendant is indigent, and I do intend to impose a fine. I will address restitution at the end. I understand the government is not seeking restitution. So we will pick that up at the end. All right. With that, I'm going to take a break, and then I will come back and hear from -- just fill a few formalities. Neither of the papers make an argument for formal downward departures, as I understood them. In any event, I've considered whether there's an appropriate basis for departure from the advisory range within the Guideline system and do not find any grounds warranting departure under the Guidelines. When we return with the Guideline calculation complete, I will hear from the parties as to what they contend a reasonable sentence is for Ms. Maxwell, taking into account the 3553(a) factors. It's 12:30, which is a shocking fact to me. I suppose we should take a 30-minute break so that everyone can get lunch, as I imagine we still have a fair amount of matters to discuss and time to get through. So we'll take a 30-minute SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011573",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 54 of 101 54",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1 assets, and then reported $22 million in assets in support of the December 2020 bail application. The claim now of an inability to pay the fine, as I understand it, at the same time in which the defense has not provided documentation of her marriage or the purported pending divorce settlement. So I am unpersuaded based on the balance of facts that the defendant is indigent, and I do intend to impose a fine. I will address restitution at the end. I understand the government is not seeking restitution. So we will pick that up at the end. All right. With that, I'm going to take a break, and then I will come back and hear from -- just fill a few formalities. Neither of the papers make an argument for formal downward departures, as I understood them. In any event, I've considered whether there's an appropriate basis for departure from the advisory range within the Guideline system and do not find any grounds warranting departure under the Guidelines. When we return with the Guideline calculation complete, I will hear from the parties as to what they contend a reasonable sentence is for Ms. Maxwell, taking into account the 3553(a) factors. It's 12:30, which is a shocking fact to me. I suppose we should take a 30-minute break so that everyone can get lunch, as I imagine we still have a fair amount of matters to discuss and time to get through. So we'll take a 30-minute",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011573",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/22/22",
      "December 2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "737",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011573"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}