mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011626.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "5",
    "document_number": "739",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 5 of 43 5 LBNAMAXTps up, which is why I'm telling you this now -- we can't predict what people are going to say on either direct or cross-examination. And of course we will follow the rules. But here's an example: If someone were to say on direct examination, \"I've never been in trouble in my entire life,\" well, then that opens up the whole panoply of what is or is not permissible under Rule 609. And so that's where we end up here. And I think, frankly, these are not issues that need to be briefed. These are issues that simply come up during trial, and if someone does something that one side or the other thinks is not appropriate, there's an objection and it's resolved. I can assure you that we are not going to do anything that is outside of the rules, and if we think it's even close, we would of course approach and address the issue with the Court. If the government wants, I am happy to confer more about this. If the government wants to brief it, they can. But I think we end up in that place, which is, these are trial-time decisions. THE COURT: That may be true, and I suspect if you have a conversation where the government says, you can't raise under the rule a juvenile conviction for -- what was it? MS. COMEY: A curfew violation, your Honor. THE COURT: -- a curfew violation, and you say, well, of course it could be that they say, I've never been in trouble SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011626",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 5 of 43 5",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LBNAMAXTps",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "up, which is why I'm telling you this now -- we can't predict what people are going to say on either direct or cross-examination. And of course we will follow the rules. But here's an example: If someone were to say on direct examination, \"I've never been in trouble in my entire life,\" well, then that opens up the whole panoply of what is or is not permissible under Rule 609. And so that's where we end up here. And I think, frankly, these are not issues that need to be briefed. These are issues that simply come up during trial, and if someone does something that one side or the other thinks is not appropriate, there's an objection and it's resolved. I can assure you that we are not going to do anything that is outside of the rules, and if we think it's even close, we would of course approach and address the issue with the Court. If the government wants, I am happy to confer more about this. If the government wants to brief it, they can. But I think we end up in that place, which is, these are trial-time decisions.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: That may be true, and I suspect if you have a conversation where the government says, you can't raise under the rule a juvenile conviction for -- what was it?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. COMEY: A curfew violation, your Honor.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: -- a curfew violation, and you say, well, of course it could be that they say, I've never been in trouble",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011626",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. COMEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "739",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011626"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}