mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011631.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "10",
    "document_number": "739",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 43 10 LBNAMAXTps something, and this witness is technically, I believe, a records custodian. He may be of a higher level than your standard records custodian, but his testimony is sort of ancillary to the charges in this indictment. THE COURT: All right. The purpose of me asking the parties to submit a list of entities or addresses that may be mentioned during trial was to capture this sort of issue. It sounds like the government failed to include a financial institution that will be mentioned during trial. I agree. It's too late to go back and redo that, having failed to do so. So I think if you think it's an issue, it's a peremptory. What else? MS. COMEY: No other issues, your Honor, other than the outstanding ones your Honor outlined. THE COURT: OK. Any -- go ahead. MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Your Honor, I wanted to talk a little bit about use of impeachment material during trial. I have a concern -- well, what I am proposing is that if we are going to be either impeaching or refreshing recollection of a particular witness, that we be able to do it electronically. I think that that would be fine, and that's typically how we would do this. The problem with using impeachment material during the course of SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 43 10 LBNAMAXTps",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "something, and this witness is technically, I believe, a records custodian. He may be of a higher level than your standard records custodian, but his testimony is sort of ancillary to the charges in this indictment. THE COURT: All right. The purpose of me asking the parties to submit a list of entities or addresses that may be mentioned during trial was to capture this sort of issue. It sounds like the government failed to include a financial institution that will be mentioned during trial. I agree. It's too late to go back and redo that, having failed to do so. So I think if you think it's an issue, it's a peremptory. What else? MS. COMEY: No other issues, your Honor, other than the outstanding ones your Honor outlined. THE COURT: OK. Any -- go ahead. MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Your Honor, I wanted to talk a little bit about use of impeachment material during trial. I have a concern -- well, what I am proposing is that if we are going to be either impeaching or refreshing recollection of a particular witness, that we be able to do it electronically. I think that that would be fine, and that's typically how we would do this. The problem with using impeachment material during the course of",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "739",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011631"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}