mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012041.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "21",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 21 of 264 427\n\n1 that regard that we can --\n2 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n3 I think materials like printouts from the internet,\n4 things like tabloid articles, Wikipedia pages, we don't think\n5 are appropriate as exhibits before the jury, and so we would\n6 object to exhibits of that nature.\n7 In addition, the samples that we've been provided\n8 include --\n9 THE COURT: Doesn't it depend what it's being used --\n10 you have an internet objection, is that the -- what's the\n11 grounds for a blanket objection to internet material?\n12 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n13 I agree that we'll have to take these as they come.\n14 Thinking ahead, we can't conceive of a basis for offering\n15 things like Wikipedia articles with this witness or tabloid\n16 articles with this witness, but we recognize the Court will\n17 have to address that as it comes because we're not quite sure\n18 what the defense argument would be. We mostly just wanted to\n19 give the Court a preview of those issues that we anticipate\n20 arising.\n21 THE COURT: Okay.\n22 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I feel like I'm trying to\n23 give them stuff in advance so they can be prepared and we can\n24 move this proceeding more quickly, but it will only come up\n25 when and if it comes up.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012041",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 21 of 264 427",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012041",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 that regard that we can --\n2 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n3 I think materials like printouts from the internet,\n4 things like tabloid articles, Wikipedia pages, we don't think\n5 are appropriate as exhibits before the jury, and so we would\n6 object to exhibits of that nature.\n7 In addition, the samples that we've been provided\n8 include --\n9 THE COURT: Doesn't it depend what it's being used --\n10 you have an internet objection, is that the -- what's the\n11 grounds for a blanket objection to internet material?\n12 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n13 I agree that we'll have to take these as they come.\n14 Thinking ahead, we can't conceive of a basis for offering\n15 things like Wikipedia articles with this witness or tabloid\n16 articles with this witness, but we recognize the Court will\n17 have to address that as it comes because we're not quite sure\n18 what the defense argument would be. We mostly just wanted to\n19 give the Court a preview of those issues that we anticipate\n20 arising.\n21 THE COURT: Okay.\n22 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I feel like I'm trying to\n23 give them stuff in advance so they can be prepared and we can\n24 move this proceeding more quickly, but it will only come up\n25 when and if it comes up.",
      "position": "main"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE",
      "THE COURT",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012041"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}