mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012234.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "214",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 214 of 264 625 LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect 1 MS. MOE: If I ask him about that, I do expect he would say, yes, other girls. And so I think unless it's a leading question, I just want to front that in order to avoid creating an issue there. 5 THE COURT: Yes. Well, lead, and that way I don't have to strike the testimony as not a prior consistent statement. 8 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. If the Court authorizes us to lead, I think we can navigate through this area. 10 THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim, okay if she leads through this portion? 12 MS. STERNHEIM: I have no problem with that, Judge, but if the witness on his own sua sponte says girls, I will be objecting to that. I cannot rely on what they are going to do or not do in closing. 16 THE COURT: I agree with that. That's why I said -- 17 MS. STERNHEIM: That's fine. 18 THE COURT: -- I will let Ms. Moe lead so I don't have to strike that testimony. I think we are in agreement that if he were to testify that she told her that there were girls, the implication would be underage; that implication wouldn't be a prior consistent statement, and so I wouldn't allow that implication to stay with the jury. 24 MS. STERNHEIM: I understand, and I thank you for that. But the other part would be there was no testimony on SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012234",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 214 of 264 625 LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MOE: If I ask him about that, I do expect he would say, yes, other girls. And so I think unless it's a leading question, I just want to front that in order to avoid creating an issue there. 5 THE COURT: Yes. Well, lead, and that way I don't have to strike the testimony as not a prior consistent statement. 8 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. If the Court authorizes us to lead, I think we can navigate through this area. 10 THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim, okay if she leads through this portion? 12 MS. STERNHEIM: I have no problem with that, Judge, but if the witness on his own sua sponte says girls, I will be objecting to that. I cannot rely on what they are going to do or not do in closing. 16 THE COURT: I agree with that. That's why I said -- 17 MS. STERNHEIM: That's fine. 18 THE COURT: -- I will let Ms. Moe lead so I don't have to strike that testimony. I think we are in agreement that if he were to testify that she told her that there were girls, the implication would be underage; that implication wouldn't be a prior consistent statement, and so I wouldn't allow that implication to stay with the jury. 24 MS. STERNHEIM: I understand, and I thank you for that. But the other part would be there was no testimony on",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012234",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Ms. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012234"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between the court and lawyers about the testimony of a witness. The conversation revolves around the issue of leading questions and prior consistent statements."
}