DOJ-OGR-00012689.json 4.3 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "175",
  4. "document_number": "749",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 175 of 236 LC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct proper foundation for these. We assumed that there would be a witness who would do this, and that Jane was the potential witness. There may be others, I don't know, but Jane didn't testify about these photographs, and so that's when we raised it, when it looked like it was a live issue, and it was only ripe when that happened. THE COURT: I have to agree with that. You're seeking to move them now, and they're raising it now. I don't disagree with what Mr. Everdell said. MS. MOE: Your Honor, we'd just like an opportunity to brief the issue. I think had we know it was defense counsel's position that in the absence of a victim identifying these photographs -- THE COURT: It doesn't have to be a victim. It could be anyone identifying -- again, you're asking to corroborate what the witness testified she saw with photographs taken -- is it 30 years? Help me with the math. MR. EVERDELL: So the search is 2019, and Jane, I think, claims she was there 1994 or 1995. So that is already almost 20 years -- THE COURT: Twenty years. MR. EVERDELL: Sorry, 25. THE COURT: Twenty-five years. -- of movable items, right, of various pieces of art, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012689",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 175 of 236",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "proper foundation for these. We assumed that there would be a witness who would do this, and that Jane was the potential witness. There may be others, I don't know, but Jane didn't testify about these photographs, and so that's when we raised it, when it looked like it was a live issue, and it was only ripe when that happened.",
  25. "position": "body"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "THE COURT: I have to agree with that. You're seeking to move them now, and they're raising it now. I don't disagree with what Mr. Everdell said.",
  30. "position": "body"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "MS. MOE: Your Honor, we'd just like an opportunity to brief the issue. I think had we know it was defense counsel's position that in the absence of a victim identifying these photographs --",
  35. "position": "body"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "THE COURT: It doesn't have to be a victim. It could be anyone identifying -- again, you're asking to corroborate what the witness testified she saw with photographs taken -- is it 30 years? Help me with the math.",
  40. "position": "body"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "MR. EVERDELL: So the search is 2019, and Jane, I think, claims she was there 1994 or 1995. So that is already almost 20 years --",
  45. "position": "body"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "THE COURT: Twenty years.",
  50. "position": "body"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "MR. EVERDELL: Sorry, 25.",
  55. "position": "body"
  56. },
  57. {
  58. "type": "printed",
  59. "content": "THE COURT: Twenty-five years.",
  60. "position": "body"
  61. },
  62. {
  63. "type": "printed",
  64. "content": "-- of movable items, right, of various pieces of art,",
  65. "position": "body"
  66. },
  67. {
  68. "type": "printed",
  69. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  70. "position": "footer"
  71. },
  72. {
  73. "type": "printed",
  74. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012689",
  75. "position": "footer"
  76. }
  77. ],
  78. "entities": {
  79. "people": [
  80. "Jane",
  81. "Mr. Everdell",
  82. "MS. MOE"
  83. ],
  84. "organizations": [
  85. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  86. ],
  87. "locations": [],
  88. "dates": [
  89. "1994",
  90. "1995",
  91. "2019",
  92. "08/10/22"
  93. ],
  94. "reference_numbers": [
  95. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  96. "749",
  97. "DOJ-OGR-00012689"
  98. ]
  99. },
  100. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  101. }