mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012772.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "21",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 21 of 261 1161 LC6Cmax1\n1    speak with Ms. Moe and we can try to come to an agreement about\n2    any further redactions. It was a civil case that was filed\n3    under a pseudonym, and I don't know if we'll be able to reach\n4    agreement, but we'll certainly try as far as a further -- I\n5    don't have an objection to having a conversation about\n6    potential further redaction.\n7    THE COURT: Okay. So J15 is sealed pending\n8    conversation that you'll discuss about redactions and just\n9    would like to button that up by the end of the day.\n10   MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. We'll do that.\n11   THE COURT: Thank you, counsel.\n12   MS. MOE: There are two additional exhibits, those are\n13   Defendant's Exhibit J8 and J9. Those are both state court\n14   documents. There are some redactions on them in their current\n15   form, but because the unredacted versions are public, anyone in\n16   possession of these redacted versions would be able to compare\n17   them against court records that have the full information which\n18   would be identifying as to Jane. For that reason, our view is\n19   that these documents should be under seal in their current\n20   form. If the defense wants to unredact more from the sealed\n21   versions, the jury has a complete unredacted version, we\n22   certainly would have no objection to that. But because these\n23   are court documents that can be compared up against public\n24   records that would easily identify Jane if a redacted version\n25   were released to the public, and for that reason, these\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012772",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 21 of 261 1161 LC6Cmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    speak with Ms. Moe and we can try to come to an agreement about\n2    any further redactions. It was a civil case that was filed\n3    under a pseudonym, and I don't know if we'll be able to reach\n4    agreement, but we'll certainly try as far as a further -- I\n5    don't have an objection to having a conversation about\n6    potential further redaction.\n7    THE COURT: Okay. So J15 is sealed pending\n8    conversation that you'll discuss about redactions and just\n9    would like to button that up by the end of the day.\n10   MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. We'll do that.\n11   THE COURT: Thank you, counsel.\n12   MS. MOE: There are two additional exhibits, those are\n13   Defendant's Exhibit J8 and J9. Those are both state court\n14   documents. There are some redactions on them in their current\n15   form, but because the unredacted versions are public, anyone in\n16   possession of these redacted versions would be able to compare\n17   them against court records that have the full information which\n18   would be identifying as to Jane. For that reason, our view is\n19   that these documents should be under seal in their current\n20   form. If the defense wants to unredact more from the sealed\n21   versions, the jury has a complete unredacted version, we\n22   certainly would have no objection to that. But because these\n23   are court documents that can be compared up against public\n24   records that would easily identify Jane if a redacted version\n25   were released to the public, and for that reason, these",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012772",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751",
      "J15",
      "J8",
      "J9",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012772"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about redactions and sealing of certain exhibits. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The footer contains the name and contact information of the reporting agency and a DOJ reference number."
}