mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013407.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "129",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 129 of 262 1834 LC8Cmax5 Rodgers - direct 1 THE COURT: I'll consider it after you confer, but you know where it was. And that's all I have. 2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, on that point, I'm assuming what the Court means is if there is a new issue raised that wasn't raised during the examination is the problem. Is that what the Court is alluding to? 3 THE COURT: Having not admitted it pending what all along had been the government's proffer as to the anticipated testimony of an anticipated witness, I didn't admit it following Mr. Alessi's testimony. It's true that there was voir dire on it, but I don't know what new argument will be asserted, and it strikes me that the fact that it -- whatever argument is being made in the absence of the witness could be an issue. 4 MR. PAGLIUCA: Right. That's what I understand. That was my understanding. I get it. 5 THE COURT: I'm open to arguments. Obviously, both sides have reargued many issues and I keep an open mind. Anything else? 6 MS. COMEY: Not from the government, your Honor. 7 MR. PAGLIUCA: Nothing from the defense, your Honor. 8 (Recess) 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013407",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 129 of 262 1834 LC8Cmax5 Rodgers - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: I'll consider it after you confer, but you know where it was. And that's all I have. 2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, on that point, I'm assuming what the Court means is if there is a new issue raised that wasn't raised during the examination is the problem. Is that what the Court is alluding to? 3 THE COURT: Having not admitted it pending what all along had been the government's proffer as to the anticipated testimony of an anticipated witness, I didn't admit it following Mr. Alessi's testimony. It's true that there was voir dire on it, but I don't know what new argument will be asserted, and it strikes me that the fact that it -- whatever argument is being made in the absence of the witness could be an issue. 4 MR. PAGLIUCA: Right. That's what I understand. That was my understanding. I get it. 5 THE COURT: I'm open to arguments. Obviously, both sides have reargued many issues and I keep an open mind. Anything else? 6 MS. COMEY: Not from the government, your Honor. 7 MR. PAGLIUCA: Nothing from the defense, your Honor. 8 (Recess)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013407",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MR. ALESSI"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013407"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}