mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013495.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "217",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 217 of 262 1928\nLC8Cmax7 Rodgers - cross\n1 A. It's a possibility.\n2 Q. Could have been any number of people, though; correct?\n3 Okay.\n4 Now, you also were shown I think an instance in your\n5 flight logs where the flight number jumped from flight 818 to\n6 flight 821. Do you remember that?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And you had said, well, sometimes you weren't flying and\n9 since this was your personal logbook, you wouldn't have\n10 recorded the other flights that were missing; right?\n11 A. That's correct.\n12 Q. But we have no information then about who may have been on\n13 those flights or where those flights went; right?\n14 A. That's correct.\n15 Q. So sitting here today, you can't say one way or the other\n16 whether, for example, Jane was on any of those missing flights;\n17 right?\n18 A. I cannot.\n19 Q. There is just no information one way or the other; correct?\n20 A. Correct.\n21 Q. Let's look at just a few different flights. I want to talk\n22 to you just a little bit about the Interlochen flights. Okay?\n23 A. Okay.\n24 Q. Let's look first at the same exhibit, but let's look at\n25 page 2.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013495",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 217 of 262 1928",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "LC8Cmax7 Rodgers - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. It's a possibility.\n2 Q. Could have been any number of people, though; correct?\n3 Okay.\n4 Now, you also were shown I think an instance in your\n5 flight logs where the flight number jumped from flight 818 to\n6 flight 821. Do you remember that?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And you had said, well, sometimes you weren't flying and\n9 since this was your personal logbook, you wouldn't have\n10 recorded the other flights that were missing; right?\n11 A. That's correct.\n12 Q. But we have no information then about who may have been on\n13 those flights or where those flights went; right?\n14 A. That's correct.\n15 Q. So sitting here today, you can't say one way or the other\n16 whether, for example, Jane was on any of those missing flights;\n17 right?\n18 A. I cannot.\n19 Q. There is just no information one way or the other; correct?\n20 A. Correct.\n21 Q. Let's look at just a few different flights. I want to talk\n22 to you just a little bit about the Interlochen flights. Okay?\n23 A. Okay.\n24 Q. Let's look first at the same exhibit, but let's look at\n25 page 2.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013495",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "Rodgers"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Interlochen"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013495"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear Q&A format. The content is related to a court case involving flight logs and missing flights. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}