mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013556.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "15",
    "document_number": "757",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 49 1988 LC9VMAXT\n\n1 THE COURT: Right. It's a streamlined version of the\n2 closing argument. And again, I'm not aware -- I'm not aware --\n3 certainly seen summary with investigative officers. That's not\n4 this. And I've seen officers who are analyzing complicated\n5 data under 1006 provide that to the jury. That's not this.\n6 And I've seen, when the evidence comes in, the government spend\n7 a fair amount of time -- as you've done with some exhibits --\n8 going through piece by piece in order to highlight and draw\n9 certain connections.\n10 I'm not going to let you do it through a witness who\n11 has no personal experience. I think you do it in closing.\n12 That's what this is, it's closing argument.\n13 MS. MOE: Understood, your Honor.\n14 THE COURT: Okay. What else?\n15 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think the only open issue that I'm\n16 aware of, your Honor, is the Exhibit 52 issue.\n17 THE COURT: Yes. I got the briefing at 9:45, so 15\n18 minutes early finished, I appreciate it. And I am still\n19 dotting my i's and crossing my t's. I think we don't need it\n20 till the government is prepared to rest; is that right?\n21 MS. COMEY: That's correct, your Honor.\n22 THE COURT: You agree with that?\n23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, your Honor.\n24 THE COURT: Anything else to take up now?\n25 MR. PAGLIUCA: Not from the defense, your Honor.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013556",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 49 1988 LC9VMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: Right. It's a streamlined version of the\n2 closing argument. And again, I'm not aware -- I'm not aware --\n3 certainly seen summary with investigative officers. That's not\n4 this. And I've seen officers who are analyzing complicated\n5 data under 1006 provide that to the jury. That's not this.\n6 And I've seen, when the evidence comes in, the government spend\n7 a fair amount of time -- as you've done with some exhibits --\n8 going through piece by piece in order to highlight and draw\n9 certain connections.\n10 I'm not going to let you do it through a witness who\n11 has no personal experience. I think you do it in closing.\n12 That's what this is, it's closing argument.\n13 MS. MOE: Understood, your Honor.\n14 THE COURT: Okay. What else?\n15 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think the only open issue that I'm\n16 aware of, your Honor, is the Exhibit 52 issue.\n17 THE COURT: Yes. I got the briefing at 9:45, so 15\n18 minutes early finished, I appreciate it. And I am still\n19 dotting my i's and crossing my t's. I think we don't need it\n20 till the government is prepared to rest; is that right?\n21 MS. COMEY: That's correct, your Honor.\n22 THE COURT: You agree with that?\n23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, your Honor.\n24 THE COURT: Anything else to take up now?\n25 MR. PAGLIUCA: Not from the defense, your Honor.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013556",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. COMEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "757",
      "52",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013556"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}