mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013864.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "5",
    "document_number": "761",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 5 of 246 2300 LCGVMAX1\ninference, the jury could find that Mr. Glassman's testimony tends to impeach Jane either as to motive to testify or impeachment by contradiction or both. So that is my guidance on the issue of the attorney -- the witness attorney testimony.\nAny questions?\nMR. ROHRBACH: None from the government, your Honor.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: I just want to be clear, your Honor.\nYou're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards.\nTHE COURT: Yes.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: The only reason I'm asking that question is we can release them and not have them appear.\nTHE COURT: Yes, on the 401/403 grounds.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Understood.\nAnd that may speed things up a little bit here, since we're releasing a couple of witnesses.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Thank you.\nAll right. Making progress.\nThere's a government objection to preclude, pursuant to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44 Kinnerton Street dated 1996. Does that have a trial mark for identification, that exhibit?\nMR. EVERDELL: It does now, I believe, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Just in time.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 5 of 246 2300 LCGVMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "inference, the jury could find that Mr. Glassman's testimony tends to impeach Jane either as to motive to testify or impeachment by contradiction or both. So that is my guidance on the issue of the attorney -- the witness attorney testimony.\nAny questions?\nMR. ROHRBACH: None from the government, your Honor.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: I just want to be clear, your Honor.\nYou're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards.\nTHE COURT: Yes.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: The only reason I'm asking that question is we can release them and not have them appear.\nTHE COURT: Yes, on the 401/403 grounds.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Understood.\nAnd that may speed things up a little bit here, since we're releasing a couple of witnesses.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Thank you.\nAll right. Making progress.\nThere's a government objection to preclude, pursuant to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44 Kinnerton Street dated 1996. Does that have a trial mark for identification, that exhibit?\nMR. EVERDELL: It does now, I believe, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Just in time.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Glassman",
      "Jane",
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Mr. Pagliuca",
      "Mr. Scarola",
      "Mr. Edwards",
      "Mr. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "London",
      "Kinnerton Street"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "1996"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "761",
      "401/403",
      "16",
      "44",
      "2300",
      "212-805-0300",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013864"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}