mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013996.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "137",
    "document_number": "761",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 137 of 246 LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct 1 (Jury not present) 2 THE COURT: The witness may step down and out for the break. Thank you. 3 4 Everyone may be seated. Are there matters to take up 5 before the break or just after the break? 6 MS. POMERANTZ: Not from the government. 7 MS. STERNHEIM: Not at this time, Judge. 8 THE COURT: Okay. You could step out, thank you. 9 THE WITNESS: Okay. 10 (Witness excused) 11 THE COURT: I just want to make sure we have clarity 12 on what needs to be resolved following the break. 13 On the prior inconsistent statements, I'm going to 14 spend my lunch looking through them, but I'm hoping there will 15 be consultation and stipulation in narrowing so that we can 16 really get down to where there is genuine disagreement after 17 you've had some discussion. 18 Is that everybody's understanding? 19 MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine with the government, your 20 Honor. 21 MR. EVERDELL: We will try to confer, see if we can 22 narrow the issues. 23 THE COURT: Okay. I don't know when you need 24 resolution of the un-narrowed issue, but my understanding is we 25 might hit that point today. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013996",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 137 of 246 LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(Jury not present) THE COURT: The witness may step down and out for the break. Thank you. Everyone may be seated. Are there matters to take up before the break or just after the break? MS. POMERANTZ: Not from the government. MS. STERNHEIM: Not at this time, Judge. THE COURT: Okay. You could step out, thank you. THE WITNESS: Okay. (Witness excused) THE COURT: I just want to make sure we have clarity on what needs to be resolved following the break. On the prior inconsistent statements, I'm going to spend my lunch looking through them, but I'm hoping there will be consultation and stipulation in narrowing so that we can really get down to where there is genuine disagreement after you've had some discussion. Is that everybody's understanding? MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine with the government, your Honor. MR. EVERDELL: We will try to confer, see if we can narrow the issues. THE COURT: Okay. I don't know when you need resolution of the un-narrowed issue, but my understanding is we might hit that point today.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013996",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013996"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}