mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014279.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "173",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 173 of 197 2714 LCHVMAX6 1 MS. MENNINGER: Oh, yes, your Honor. I apologize. I have copies for the Court, and I gave a copy to the government. 2 THE COURT: Okay. 3 MR. ROHRBACH: Judge Chin sets out the summary 4 judgment standard on page 12. 5 THE COURT: Yes. 6 7 Do you want to respond to the summary judgment point? 8 So 201(b), the Court may judicially notice a fact that 9 is not subject to reasonable dispute. 10 MS. MENNINGER: This was the government's motion for 11 summary judgment; and it was Mr. Epstein's admission that 12 that's when he vacated the premises. So I don't think that -- 13 in terms of that's why I think that you need to take both the 14 answers and the summary judgment together, rather than trying 15 to introduce one or the other. It was the government's 16 position that he abandoned in January of '96, and he admitted 17 that. 18 MR. ROHRBACH: The defense is not offering any of 19 these documents which contain the government's position, your 20 Honor. 21 MS. MENNINGER: That's not true. 22 Docket entry 52 is a submission by the government. 23 MR. ROHRBACH: I apologize. I'm talking about the 24 summary judgment opinion and the answers, but not the 25 government's claims, which is not a document -- I'll speak -- SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014279",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 173 of 197 2714 LCHVMAX6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014279",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MENNINGER: Oh, yes, your Honor. I apologize. I have copies for the Court, and I gave a copy to the government. 2 THE COURT: Okay. 3 MR. ROHRBACH: Judge Chin sets out the summary 4 judgment standard on page 12. 5 THE COURT: Yes. 6 7 Do you want to respond to the summary judgment point? 8 So 201(b), the Court may judicially notice a fact that 9 is not subject to reasonable dispute. 10 MS. MENNINGER: This was the government's motion for 11 summary judgment; and it was Mr. Epstein's admission that 12 that's when he vacated the premises. So I don't think that -- 13 in terms of that's why I think that you need to take both the 14 answers and the summary judgment together, rather than trying 15 to introduce one or the other. It was the government's 16 position that he abandoned in January of '96, and he admitted 17 that. 18 MR. ROHRBACH: The defense is not offering any of 19 these documents which contain the government's position, your 20 Honor. 21 MS. MENNINGER: That's not true. 22 Docket entry 52 is a submission by the government. 23 MR. ROHRBACH: I apologize. I'm talking about the 24 summary judgment opinion and the answers, but not the 25 government's claims, which is not a document -- I'll speak --",
      "position": "main content"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Judge Chin"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "THE COURT",
      "THE GOVERNMENT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "January of '96"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 763",
      "Docket entry 52",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014279"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}