mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014461.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "61",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 61 of 257 2894\nLCKCmax3 Summation - Ms. Moe\n1 that Maxwell knew Carolyn was underage.\n2 And we're talking about the counts one by one, but I\n3 want to step back and ask you to keep in mind, you don't have\n4 to set aside all of the evidence you heard in this case when\n5 you examine each count, it's the opposite. The pattern\n6 throughout the case tells you that the defendant knew these\n7 girls were under age and she knew that they were going to be\n8 molested. You should consider all of that evidence as you\n9 examine each count.\n10 The third element of Count Six is that the defendant\n11 knew Carolyn would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act.\n12 And here, a commercial sex act just means a sex act in exchange\n13 for money. That's what happened to Carolyn. She was paid\n14 hundreds of dollars every time that she was abused. Sometimes\n15 Maxwell handed over the cash herself.\n16 And we've been talking all morning about the\n17 overwhelming evidence that Maxwell knew these girls would be\n18 sexually abused in those so-called massages. She absolutely\n19 knew.\n20 Finally, there is a fourth element here. In\n21 interstate commerce here means something a little different\n22 than the first two counts we talked about. We're not talking\n23 about travel across state lines. Instead, we're talking about\n24 an effect on interstate commerce.\n25 So when Carolyn got packages from New York, when she\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014461",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 61 of 257 2894",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCKCmax3 Summation - Ms. Moe",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 that Maxwell knew Carolyn was underage.\n2 And we're talking about the counts one by one, but I\n3 want to step back and ask you to keep in mind, you don't have\n4 to set aside all of the evidence you heard in this case when\n5 you examine each count, it's the opposite. The pattern\n6 throughout the case tells you that the defendant knew these\n7 girls were under age and she knew that they were going to be\n8 molested. You should consider all of that evidence as you\n9 examine each count.\n10 The third element of Count Six is that the defendant\n11 knew Carolyn would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act.\n12 And here, a commercial sex act just means a sex act in exchange\n13 for money. That's what happened to Carolyn. She was paid\n14 hundreds of dollars every time that she was abused. Sometimes\n15 Maxwell handed over the cash herself.\n16 And we've been talking all morning about the\n17 overwhelming evidence that Maxwell knew these girls would be\n18 sexually abused in those so-called massages. She absolutely\n19 knew.\n20 Finally, there is a fourth element here. In\n21 interstate commerce here means something a little different\n22 than the first two counts we talked about. We're not talking\n23 about travel across state lines. Instead, we're talking about\n24 an effect on interstate commerce.\n25 So when Carolyn got packages from New York, when she",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014461",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Carolyn",
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014461"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case against Maxwell. The text discusses the elements of Count Six and the evidence presented in the case. The document is typed and contains no handwritten text or stamps."
}