mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00014755.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "779",
    "date": "08/22/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 8 of 101 8 M6SQmax1 admitted at trial showed that accounts under Epstein's name wired approximately $23 million over two occasions during the conspiracy to accounts of \"Ghislaine Maxwell.\" The defendant's assertion that Epstein's accountant may have had access to and control over these accounts does not undermine the reasonable inference that the defendant controlled the funds in accounts bearing her name, so that is established by a preponderance. As to the third objection that there's no evidence in the record that Epstein bought the defendant her New York City townhouse, I overrule that objection because I credit Kate's testimony that the defendant told her that Epstein bought the defendant her New York townhouse. Paragraph 25 is an objection to the characterization of the Palm Beach residence being operated through a culture of silence. You'll let me know if you're not maintaining an objection. MR. EVERDELL: Yes. I think that the default is we are, your Honor. THE COURT: Understood. I overrule this objection. Evidence at trial indicates that this was the case. For example, the household manual instructed employees to \"see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing.\" I credit Mr. Alessi's testimony that he understood this instruction to be a kind of warning that he was supposed SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014755",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 8 of 101 8 M6SQmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "admitted at trial showed that accounts under Epstein's name wired approximately $23 million over two occasions during the conspiracy to accounts of \"Ghislaine Maxwell.\" The defendant's assertion that Epstein's accountant may have had access to and control over these accounts does not undermine the reasonable inference that the defendant controlled the funds in accounts bearing her name, so that is established by a preponderance. As to the third objection that there's no evidence in the record that Epstein bought the defendant her New York City townhouse, I overrule that objection because I credit Kate's testimony that the defendant told her that Epstein bought the defendant her New York townhouse. Paragraph 25 is an objection to the characterization of the Palm Beach residence being operated through a culture of silence. You'll let me know if you're not maintaining an objection. MR. EVERDELL: Yes. I think that the default is we are, your Honor. THE COURT: Understood. I overrule this objection. Evidence at trial indicates that this was the case. For example, the household manual instructed employees to \"see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing.\" I credit Mr. Alessi's testimony that he understood this instruction to be a kind of warning that he was supposed",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014755",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Kate",
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "Mr. Alessi"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York City",
      "Palm Beach"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/22/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "779",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014755"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}