| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "12",
- "document_number": "779",
- "date": "08/22/22",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 12 of 101 12 M6SQmax1 objection is overruled. Annie testified to this fact at trial, and I credit this testimony. Paragraph 5 -- sorry -- did it again. 55, defendant makes three objections to the paragraph. I overrule the objections. The record supports that the defendant personally recruited Virginia to provide Epstein with sexualized massages when she was a minor. Jane and Kate's testimony established that the defendant was aware that the massages were sexualized. I credit Mr. Alessi's testimony that the defendant approached Virginia, and that Virginia visited the residence -- approached Virginia for the first time, and that Virginia visited the residence later that day. Flight records and credible witness testimony established that this meeting occurred before Virginia was 18. In addition, when Virginia brought Carolyn to the residence, the defendant greeted them and instructed Virginia to show Carolyn -- quoting from the trial record -- \"what to do.\" Carolyn then witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. Finally, as I explained in my resolution to paragraphs 27 and 28, I do conclude that there is a sufficient basis to find by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant used monetary incentives to encourage Virginia to recruit Carolyn. Paragraph 58, the defendant objects to the assertion that Carolyn was 14 years old when Virginia brought her to Epstein's residence, claiming that Carolyn's recollection is SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014759",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 12 of 101 12",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "M6SQmax1 objection is overruled. Annie testified to this fact at trial, and I credit this testimony. Paragraph 5 -- sorry -- did it again. 55, defendant makes three objections to the paragraph. I overrule the objections. The record supports that the defendant personally recruited Virginia to provide Epstein with sexualized massages when she was a minor. Jane and Kate's testimony established that the defendant was aware that the massages were sexualized. I credit Mr. Alessi's testimony that the defendant approached Virginia, and that Virginia visited the residence -- approached Virginia for the first time, and that Virginia visited the residence later that day. Flight records and credible witness testimony established that this meeting occurred before Virginia was 18. In addition, when Virginia brought Carolyn to the residence, the defendant greeted them and instructed Virginia to show Carolyn -- quoting from the trial record -- \"what to do.\" Carolyn then witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. Finally, as I explained in my resolution to paragraphs 27 and 28, I do conclude that there is a sufficient basis to find by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant used monetary incentives to encourage Virginia to recruit Carolyn. Paragraph 58, the defendant objects to the assertion that Carolyn was 14 years old when Virginia brought her to Epstein's residence, claiming that Carolyn's recollection is",
- "position": "main content"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014759",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Annie",
- "Virginia",
- "Epstein",
- "Jane",
- "Kate",
- "Mr. Alessi",
- "Carolyn"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/22/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "779",
- "DOJ-OGR-00014759"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. The text discusses the testimony of various witnesses and the defendant's objections to certain statements. The document is typed and appears to be a formal legal document."
- }
|