DOJ-OGR-00014841.json 4.0 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "94",
  4. "document_number": "779",
  5. "date": "08/22/22",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 94 of 101 94 M6s2Max2 represents that she has heard similarly from other defense counsel. I take all of these factors into account consistent with the 3553(a) statutory provision when deciding what sentence to impose. Beyond these factors, much of the defense written submission, not the oral statement today, but much of the written submission focused on a series of complaints about Ms. Maxwell's pretrial detention. As I have said in many sentencing proceedings since the pandemic began, the conditions in the MDC have been extremely difficult for all inmates as a result. There have been extended periods of lockdown, health risks, and the lack of access to legal and social visits and programming and the like. Conditions at the MDC are, to put it mildly, not what they should be, and serving time during the pandemic has been more difficult than serving time before it. As I have in other sentencings, I take into account this in imposing an appropriate sentence. I also take into account that, as a high-profile defendant charged and convicted of sex offenses against minors, Ms. Maxwell faces security risks and has endured additional isolation and surveillance beyond the typical pretrial detainee. That said, I largely reject the defense's primary written contention that Ms. Maxwell has been singled out for uniquely harsh and punishing treatment. To the contrary, I agree with the government that many of the complaints have been SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014841",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 94 of 101 94",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "M6s2Max2 represents that she has heard similarly from other defense counsel. I take all of these factors into account consistent with the 3553(a) statutory provision when deciding what sentence to impose. Beyond these factors, much of the defense written submission, not the oral statement today, but much of the written submission focused on a series of complaints about Ms. Maxwell's pretrial detention. As I have said in many sentencing proceedings since the pandemic began, the conditions in the MDC have been extremely difficult for all inmates as a result. There have been extended periods of lockdown, health risks, and the lack of access to legal and social visits and programming and the like. Conditions at the MDC are, to put it mildly, not what they should be, and serving time during the pandemic has been more difficult than serving time before it. As I have in other sentencings, I take into account this in imposing an appropriate sentence. I also take into account that, as a high-profile defendant charged and convicted of sex offenses against minors, Ms. Maxwell faces security risks and has endured additional isolation and surveillance beyond the typical pretrial detainee. That said, I largely reject the defense's primary written contention that Ms. Maxwell has been singled out for uniquely harsh and punishing treatment. To the contrary, I agree with the government that many of the complaints have been",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014841",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. }
  27. ],
  28. "entities": {
  29. "people": [
  30. "Ms. Maxwell"
  31. ],
  32. "organizations": [
  33. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  34. ],
  35. "locations": [
  36. "MDC"
  37. ],
  38. "dates": [
  39. "08/22/22"
  40. ],
  41. "reference_numbers": [
  42. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  43. "779",
  44. "DOJ-OGR-00014841"
  45. ]
  46. },
  47. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or sentencing document. The text is printed and legible. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  48. }