mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00014859.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "23",
    "document_number": "20-2200330-PAE",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-2200330-PAE Document 178 Filed 02/12/21 Page 23 of 26 District Court imposed a $750,000 fine and a $300 mandatory special assessment. This appeal followed. II. DISCUSSION 1. The NPA Between Epstein and USAO-SDFL Did Not Bar Maxwell's Prosecution by USAO-SDNY Maxwell sought dismissal of the charges in the Indictment on the grounds that the NPA made between Epstein and USAO-SDFL immunized her from prosecution on all counts as a third-party beneficiary of the NPA. The District Court denied the motion, rejecting Maxwell's arguments. We agree. We review de novo the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment.9 In arguing that the NPA barred her prosecution by USAO-SDNY, Maxwell cites the portion of the NPA in which \"the United States [ ] agree[d] that it w[ould] not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.\"10 We hold that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY. It is well established in our Circuit that \"[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement 9 See, e.g., United States v. Walters, 910 F.3d 11, 22 (2d Cir. 2018). 10 A-178. 9 DOJ-OGR-00014859",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-2200330-PAE Document 178 Filed 02/12/21 Page 23 of 26",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "District Court imposed a $750,000 fine and a $300 mandatory special assessment. This appeal followed.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. DISCUSSION",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1. The NPA Between Epstein and USAO-SDFL Did Not Bar Maxwell's Prosecution by USAO-SDNY",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Maxwell sought dismissal of the charges in the Indictment on the grounds that the NPA made between Epstein and USAO-SDFL immunized her from prosecution on all counts as a third-party beneficiary of the NPA. The District Court denied the motion, rejecting Maxwell's arguments. We agree. We review de novo the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment.9",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In arguing that the NPA barred her prosecution by USAO-SDNY, Maxwell cites the portion of the NPA in which \"the United States [ ] agree[d] that it w[ould] not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.\"10 We hold that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "It is well established in our Circuit that \"[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "9 See, e.g., United States v. Walters, 910 F.3d 11, 22 (2d Cir. 2018). 10 A-178.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "9 DOJ-OGR-00014859",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USAO-SDFL",
      "USAO-SDNY",
      "United States Attorney"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/12/21",
      "2018"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-2200330-PAE",
      "178",
      "910 F.3d 11",
      "A-178",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014859"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document from a legal case involving Maxwell and Epstein. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}