DOJ-OGR-00014928.json 3.7 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "52",
  4. "document_number": "782",
  5. "date": "01/15/25",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 52 of 158 52 LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct 1 provided data supporting that this is a process that is well known and well established in the literature, and then it pointed to directions that were needed for future work. It pointed to some of the concerns about definitions and things that -- suggestions, basically, for issues that needed to be addressed in future research. 7 Q. Do you agree with all of the conclusions of this article? 8 A. I do not. 9 Q. I want to direct your attention to Page 959. And I want to zoom in on the paragraph above current definitions. It's about four lines down. It starts with \"Furthermore.\" 12 A. Okay. 13 MS. POMERANTZ: We can highlight those next two sentences. 15 Q. Dr. Rocchio, could you review the highlighted text. 16 A. Okay. 17 MS. POMERANTZ: And for purposes of the record, your Honor, I'm happy to read that. 19 THE COURT: The sentence beginning with \"Furthermore\" and ending with \"negatives.\" 21 MS. POMERANTZ: Thank you, your Honor. 22 BY MS. POMERANTZ: 23 Q. Dr. Rocchio, what is your reaction to this? 24 A. I think it's incomplete and I disagree with the conclusion. 25 Q. Can you explain? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014928",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 52 of 158 52",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 provided data supporting that this is a process that is well known and well established in the literature, and then it pointed to directions that were needed for future work. It pointed to some of the concerns about definitions and things that -- suggestions, basically, for issues that needed to be addressed in future research. 7 Q. Do you agree with all of the conclusions of this article? 8 A. I do not. 9 Q. I want to direct your attention to Page 959. And I want to zoom in on the paragraph above current definitions. It's about four lines down. It starts with \"Furthermore.\" 12 A. Okay. 13 MS. POMERANTZ: We can highlight those next two sentences. 15 Q. Dr. Rocchio, could you review the highlighted text. 16 A. Okay. 17 MS. POMERANTZ: And for purposes of the record, your Honor, I'm happy to read that. 19 THE COURT: The sentence beginning with \"Furthermore\" and ending with \"negatives.\" 21 MS. POMERANTZ: Thank you, your Honor. 22 BY MS. POMERANTZ: 23 Q. Dr. Rocchio, what is your reaction to this? 24 A. I think it's incomplete and I disagree with the conclusion. 25 Q. Can you explain?",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014928",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Dr. Rocchio",
  41. "MS. POMERANTZ"
  42. ],
  43. "organizations": [
  44. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  45. ],
  46. "locations": [],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "01/15/25"
  49. ],
  50. "reference_numbers": [
  51. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  52. "782",
  53. "DOJ-OGR-00014928"
  54. ]
  55. },
  56. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with some dialogue between MS. POMERANTZ and Dr. Rocchio. The footer contains the name and contact information of the reporting agency and a reference number."
  57. }