mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015020.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "144",
    "document_number": "782",
    "date": "01/15/25",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 144 of 158 144 LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross\n\n1 Q. And do you recall that initially the authors considered 322 articles and selected 33 out of those 332?\n2 A. I don't recall that as we sit here today, specifically, no. I'm sorry.\n3 Q. And if we can go to page 3 of Government Exhibit 6. Page 3 starts a table that has a summary of the various articles that were reviewed. Is that correct?\n4 A. That's my understanding, yes.\n5 Q. So let's look at some of the -- this study considered males and females, correct?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. And you know that males tend to not report as frequently as females for a variety of psychological issues, correct?\n8 A. Correct.\n9 Either not report or delay further.\n10 Q. Right.\n11 A. So that would be one of the predictors or facilitators of delayed disclosure.\n12 Q. And you're aware -- are you aware that this case does not involve any allegation of delayed reporting by males?\n13 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\n14 THE COURT: What's the grounds?\n15 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, she doesn't know about this case, the specific details.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, I think that's my point, your\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00015020",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 144 of 158 144 LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. And do you recall that initially the authors considered 322 articles and selected 33 out of those 332?\n2 A. I don't recall that as we sit here today, specifically, no. I'm sorry.\n3 Q. And if we can go to page 3 of Government Exhibit 6. Page 3 starts a table that has a summary of the various articles that were reviewed. Is that correct?\n4 A. That's my understanding, yes.\n5 Q. So let's look at some of the -- this study considered males and females, correct?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. And you know that males tend to not report as frequently as females for a variety of psychological issues, correct?\n8 A. Correct.\n9 Either not report or delay further.\n10 Q. Right.\n11 A. So that would be one of the predictors or facilitators of delayed disclosure.\n12 Q. And you're aware -- are you aware that this case does not involve any allegation of delayed reporting by males?\n13 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\n14 THE COURT: What's the grounds?\n15 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, she doesn't know about this case, the specific details.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, I think that's my point, your",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015020",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Rocchio",
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "01/15/25"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "782",
      "DOJ-OGR-00015020"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}