mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015021.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "145",
    "document_number": "782",
    "date": "01/15/25",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 145 of 158 145 LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross\n1 Honor, part of my point.\n2 THE COURT: If the point is that she doesn't know any\n3 of the facts of the specific case and the government concedes\n4 that's true, we can move on.\n5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.\n6 I guess the other point, your Honor, which I can\n7 develop, is, these studies that are included and impact the\n8 statistics are really not relevant here because they deal with\n9 males or a combination of males and females, and there are only\n10 a few of them that deal with females specifically.\n11 THE COURT: OK.\n12 MR. PAGLIUCA: So when we're conflating these things,\n13 it conflates the numbers.\n14 May I proceed, your Honor?\n15 THE COURT: You may.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you.\n17 Q. So that the first study, which is in 2016, in the last\n18 column, is all males. Do you see that?\n19 A. Could you -- the page is upside down on my screen. Can we\n20 rotate it so that I can look at what you're seeing, please.\n21 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't know if Ms. Drescher can do\n22 that or not.\n23 THE WITNESS: Or I can look at a paper copy. But I --\n24 there's no way I can read that.\n25 THE COURT: I can't read it either.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00015021",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 145 of 158 145 LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Honor, part of my point.\n2 THE COURT: If the point is that she doesn't know any\n3 of the facts of the specific case and the government concedes\n4 that's true, we can move on.\n5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.\n6 I guess the other point, your Honor, which I can\n7 develop, is, these studies that are included and impact the\n8 statistics are really not relevant here because they deal with\n9 males or a combination of males and females, and there are only\n10 a few of them that deal with females specifically.\n11 THE COURT: OK.\n12 MR. PAGLIUCA: So when we're conflating these things,\n13 it conflates the numbers.\n14 May I proceed, your Honor?\n15 THE COURT: You may.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you.\n17 Q. So that the first study, which is in 2016, in the last\n18 column, is all males. Do you see that?\n19 A. Could you -- the page is upside down on my screen. Can we\n20 rotate it so that I can look at what you're seeing, please.\n21 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't know if Ms. Drescher can do\n22 that or not.\n23 THE WITNESS: Or I can look at a paper copy. But I --\n24 there's no way I can read that.\n25 THE COURT: I can't read it either.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015021",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "Ms. Drescher"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "01/15/25",
      "2016"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "782",
      "DOJ-OGR-00015021"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between the court and lawyers about the relevance of certain studies. The transcript includes a witness testimony and a conversation about a document on a screen that is upside down."
}