mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015028.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "152",
    "document_number": "782",
    "date": "01/15/25",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 152 of 158 152 LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross\n1 not the difference between 42 and 58 percent.\n2 A. I was talking about the majority. And they define there, I\n3 believe in this article, again assuming this summary is\n4 accurate, that they were defining childhood as under the age of\n5 18.\n6 Q. And I have two more of these I think we need to look at.\n7\n8 THE COURT: Are we still on disclosure or another\n9 opinion?\n10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, we're on disclosure.\n11 THE COURT: I think you can wrap up disclosure.\n12 MR. PAGLIUCA: All right, your Honor. I get it.\n13 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:\n14 Q. So there are other reasons, outside of the statistics, that\n15 individuals who, at some point later in life, claim to be\n16 sexually assaulted make that claim. Correct?\n17 A. Outside of what statistics?\n18 Q. Well, you've been talking about delayed disclosure as a\n19 predictor of sexual assault. Is that correct?\n20 A. No, that is incorrect.\n21 Q. What is the significance, as far as you are concerned, with\n22 delays in disclosures as part of your opinions?\n23 THE COURT: If you'd like, Mr. Pagliuca, you don't\n24 have to, but you can take off your mask in the podium box if\n25 you like.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: I appreciate it.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00015028",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 152 of 158 152 LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 not the difference between 42 and 58 percent.\n2 A. I was talking about the majority. And they define there, I\n3 believe in this article, again assuming this summary is\n4 accurate, that they were defining childhood as under the age of\n5 18.\n6 Q. And I have two more of these I think we need to look at.\n7\n8 THE COURT: Are we still on disclosure or another\n9 opinion?\n10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes, we're on disclosure.\n11 THE COURT: I think you can wrap up disclosure.\n12 MR. PAGLIUCA: All right, your Honor. I get it.\n13 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:\n14 Q. So there are other reasons, outside of the statistics, that\n15 individuals who, at some point later in life, claim to be\n16 sexually assaulted make that claim. Correct?\n17 A. Outside of what statistics?\n18 Q. Well, you've been talking about delayed disclosure as a\n19 predictor of sexual assault. Is that correct?\n20 A. No, that is incorrect.\n21 Q. What is the significance, as far as you are concerned, with\n22 delays in disclosures as part of your opinions?\n23 THE COURT: If you'd like, Mr. Pagliuca, you don't\n24 have to, but you can take off your mask in the podium box if\n25 you like.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: I appreciate it.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015028",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "01/15/25"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "782",
      "DOJ-OGR-00015028"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}