mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015048.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "789",
    "date": "07/22/25",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 789 Filed 07/22/25 Page 2 of 4\n\nare certain \"special circumstances\" in which release of grand jury records is appropriate, based upon a court's supervisory authority over grand juries it empanels. See In re Craig, 131 F.3d at 102; see also id. at 104 (\"The discretion of a trial court in deciding whether to make public the ordinarily secret proceedings of a grand jury investigation is one of the broadest and most sensitive exercises of careful judgment that a trial judge can make.\"). The Second Circuit has identified the following as a non-exhaustive list of factors for district courts to weigh in considering applications for disclosure:\n\n- the identity of the party seeking disclosure;\n- whether the defendant to the grand jury proceeding or the Government opposes the disclosure;\n- why disclosure is being sought in the particular case;\n- what specific information is being sought for disclosure;\n- how long ago the grand jury proceedings took place;\n- the current status of the principals of the grand jury proceedings and that of their families;\n- the extent to which the desired material - either permissibly or impermissibly - has been previously made public;\n- whether witnesses to the grand jury proceedings who might be affected by disclosure are still alive; and\n- [whether there is an] additional need for maintaining secrecy in the particular case in question.\n\nId. at 106 (capitalization altered); see also Laws. 'Comm. for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. v. Garland, 43 F.4th 276, 285 (2d Cir. 2022) (affirming district court's application of those factors).2\n\n2 The Seventh Circuit is in accord that a district court may order the release of grand jury materials upon a showing of special circumstances. See Carlson v. United States, 837 F.3d 753, 766-67 (7th Cir. 2016). Other circuits have taken a narrower view of a court's authority to order such relief. See, e.g., McKeever v Barr, 920 F.3d 842, 843, 850 (D.C. Cir. 2019), cert denied,",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 789 Filed 07/22/25 Page 2 of 4",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "are certain \"special circumstances\" in which release of grand jury records is appropriate, based upon a court's supervisory authority over grand juries it empanels. See In re Craig, 131 F.3d at 102; see also id. at 104 (\"The discretion of a trial court in deciding whether to make public the ordinarily secret proceedings of a grand jury investigation is one of the broadest and most sensitive exercises of careful judgment that a trial judge can make.\"). The Second Circuit has identified the following as a non-exhaustive list of factors for district courts to weigh in considering applications for disclosure:",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "- the identity of the party seeking disclosure;\n- whether the defendant to the grand jury proceeding or the Government opposes the disclosure;\n- why disclosure is being sought in the particular case;\n- what specific information is being sought for disclosure;\n- how long ago the grand jury proceedings took place;\n- the current status of the principals of the grand jury proceedings and that of their families;\n- the extent to which the desired material - either permissibly or impermissibly - has been previously made public;\n- whether witnesses to the grand jury proceedings who might be affected by disclosure are still alive; and\n- [whether there is an] additional need for maintaining secrecy in the particular case in question.",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Id. at 106 (capitalization altered); see also Laws. 'Comm. for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. v. Garland, 43 F.4th 276, 285 (2d Cir. 2022) (affirming district court's application of those factors).2",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2 The Seventh Circuit is in accord that a district court may order the release of grand jury materials upon a showing of special circumstances. See Carlson v. United States, 837 F.3d 753, 766-67 (7th Cir. 2016). Other circuits have taken a narrower view of a court's authority to order such relief. See, e.g., McKeever v Barr, 920 F.3d 842, 843, 850 (D.C. Cir. 2019), cert denied,",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015048",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Second Circuit",
      "Seventh Circuit",
      "D.C. Cir."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/22/25",
      "2016",
      "2019",
      "2022"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "789",
      "131 F.3d",
      "837 F.3d 753",
      "920 F.3d 842",
      "43 F.4th 276"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a grand jury investigation. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is page 2 of 4."
}