DOJ-OGR-00015057.json 3.1 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "3",
  4. "document_number": "794",
  5. "date": "07/23/25",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": true,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 794 Filed 07/23/25 Page 3 of 3\nFed. Grand Jury Procs., 760 F.2d 436, 439 (2d Cir. 1985) (“Recognizing the importance of secrecy to the proper functioning of the grand jury system, the Supreme Court has established a strict test of particularized need[.]”); United States v. Sobotka, 623 F.2d 764, 768 (2d Cir. 1980) (“[T]he showing of need [for grand jury materials] must be made ‘with particularity’ so that ‘the secrecy of the proceedings (may be) lifted discretely and limitedly.”) (quoting Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. at 682–83)); United States v. Laster, 313 F. App’x 369, 371 (2d Cir. 2009) (similar).\nSO ORDERED.\nDated: July 23, 2025 New York, New York\nPAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 794 Filed 07/23/25 Page 3 of 3",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Fed. Grand Jury Procs., 760 F.2d 436, 439 (2d Cir. 1985) (“Recognizing the importance of secrecy to the proper functioning of the grand jury system, the Supreme Court has established a strict test of particularized need[.]”); United States v. Sobotka, 623 F.2d 764, 768 (2d Cir. 1980) (“[T]he showing of need [for grand jury materials] must be made ‘with particularity’ so that ‘the secrecy of the proceedings (may be) lifted discretely and limitedly.”) (quoting Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. at 682–83)); United States v. Laster, 313 F. App’x 369, 371 (2d Cir. 2009) (similar).",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SO ORDERED.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "handwritten",
  29. "content": "Paul A. Engelmayr",
  30. "position": "signature"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "PAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge",
  35. "position": "main"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "Dated: July 23, 2025 New York, New York",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "3",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015057",
  50. "position": "footer"
  51. }
  52. ],
  53. "entities": {
  54. "people": [
  55. "Paul A. Engelmayr"
  56. ],
  57. "organizations": [
  58. "Supreme Court",
  59. "Procter & Gamble Co."
  60. ],
  61. "locations": [
  62. "New York"
  63. ],
  64. "dates": [
  65. "July 23, 2025",
  66. "1985",
  67. "1980",
  68. "2009"
  69. ],
  70. "reference_numbers": [
  71. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  72. "794",
  73. "760 F.2d 436",
  74. "623 F.2d 764",
  75. "313 F. App'x 369",
  76. "356 U.S.",
  77. "DOJ-OGR-00015057"
  78. ]
  79. },
  80. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order from a United States District Judge. The text is mostly printed, with a handwritten signature. There are no visible stamps or redactions."
  81. }