| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "3",
- "document_number": "794",
- "date": "07/23/25",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": true,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 794 Filed 07/23/25 Page 3 of 3\nFed. Grand Jury Procs., 760 F.2d 436, 439 (2d Cir. 1985) (“Recognizing the importance of secrecy to the proper functioning of the grand jury system, the Supreme Court has established a strict test of particularized need[.]”); United States v. Sobotka, 623 F.2d 764, 768 (2d Cir. 1980) (“[T]he showing of need [for grand jury materials] must be made ‘with particularity’ so that ‘the secrecy of the proceedings (may be) lifted discretely and limitedly.”) (quoting Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. at 682–83)); United States v. Laster, 313 F. App’x 369, 371 (2d Cir. 2009) (similar).\nSO ORDERED.\nDated: July 23, 2025 New York, New York\nPAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 794 Filed 07/23/25 Page 3 of 3",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Fed. Grand Jury Procs., 760 F.2d 436, 439 (2d Cir. 1985) (“Recognizing the importance of secrecy to the proper functioning of the grand jury system, the Supreme Court has established a strict test of particularized need[.]”); United States v. Sobotka, 623 F.2d 764, 768 (2d Cir. 1980) (“[T]he showing of need [for grand jury materials] must be made ‘with particularity’ so that ‘the secrecy of the proceedings (may be) lifted discretely and limitedly.”) (quoting Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. at 682–83)); United States v. Laster, 313 F. App’x 369, 371 (2d Cir. 2009) (similar).",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SO ORDERED.",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "handwritten",
- "content": "Paul A. Engelmayr",
- "position": "signature"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "PAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Dated: July 23, 2025 New York, New York",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "3",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015057",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Paul A. Engelmayr"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Supreme Court",
- "Procter & Gamble Co."
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "July 23, 2025",
- "1985",
- "1980",
- "2009"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "794",
- "760 F.2d 436",
- "623 F.2d 764",
- "313 F. App'x 369",
- "356 U.S.",
- "DOJ-OGR-00015057"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order from a United States District Judge. The text is mostly printed, with a handwritten signature. There are no visible stamps or redactions."
- }
|