| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "1",
- "document_number": "809",
- "date": "08/11/25",
- "document_type": "Court Opinion & Order",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 809 Filed 08/11/25 Page 1 of 31\n\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\n\n-v-\n\nGHISLAINE MAXWELL,\n\nDefendant.\n\n20 Cr. 330 (PAE)\n\nOPINION & ORDER\n\nPAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:\n\nOn December 29, 2021, a jury convicted defendant Ghislaine Maxwell of five felonies involving the sexual abuse of young girls that she and the notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein committed between 1994 and 2004. This decision resolves the Government's July 18, 2025 motion to unseal grand jury transcripts and exhibits in Maxwell's case, subject to redactions aimed at protecting victim confidentiality. Dkt. 785; see also Dkt. 808. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies the motion.1\n\nI. Background to the Motion to Unseal\n\nA. Indictments\n\nIn late November 2018, prompted by investigative journalism, the United States Attorney in this District opened an investigation into Epstein and his co-conspirators. On July 2, 2019, a grand jury returned an indictment that charged Epstein with participating in a sex trafficking conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a) and (b).2 On July 6, 2019, Epstein was arrested.\n\n1 A motion seeking, on similar terms, the unsealing of grand jury materials in Epstein's case is pending before the Hon. Richard M. Berman. See United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2025), Dkt. 61.\n\n2 See United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2019), Dkt. 2.\n\nDOJ-OGR-00015133",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 809 Filed 08/11/25 Page 1 of 31",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -v- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "20 Cr. 330 (PAE) OPINION & ORDER",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On December 29, 2021, a jury convicted defendant Ghislaine Maxwell of five felonies involving the sexual abuse of young girls that she and the notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein committed between 1994 and 2004. This decision resolves the Government's July 18, 2025 motion to unseal grand jury transcripts and exhibits in Maxwell's case, subject to redactions aimed at protecting victim confidentiality. Dkt. 785; see also Dkt. 808. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies the motion.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "I. Background to the Motion to Unseal A. Indictments In late November 2018, prompted by investigative journalism, the United States Attorney in this District opened an investigation into Epstein and his co-conspirators. On July 2, 2019, a grand jury returned an indictment that charged Epstein with participating in a sex trafficking conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a) and (b). On July 6, 2019, Epstein was arrested.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 A motion seeking, on similar terms, the unsealing of grand jury materials in Epstein's case is pending before the Hon. Richard M. Berman. See United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2025), Dkt. 61. 2 See United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2019), Dkt. 2.",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015133",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Ghislaine Maxwell",
- "Jeffrey Epstein",
- "Paul A. Engel Mayer",
- "Richard M. Berman"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
- "United States Attorney"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "December 29, 2021",
- "July 18, 2025",
- "November 2018",
- "July 2, 2019",
- "July 6, 2019",
- "1994",
- "2004"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "Document 809",
- "20 Cr. 330 (PAE)",
- "19 Cr. 490 (RMB)",
- "Dkt. 785",
- "Dkt. 808",
- "Dkt. 61",
- "Dkt. 2"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court opinion and order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is a formal legal document with proper formatting and citations. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
- }
|