| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "9",
- "document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00015194",
- "date": null,
- "document_type": "First Amended Complaint",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": ". vs. Epstein, et al. First Amended Complaint COUNT II Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §2255 June 2002- Incident 2 27. Approximately one week after the first incident, received a telephone call from JEFFREY EPSTEIN requesting that she return to his residence. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed to undress to her brassiere and underwear and to provide him with a massage. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated himself in presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 for this encounter. 9 DOJ-OGR-00015194",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": ". vs. Epstein, et al.",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "First Amended Complaint",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "COUNT II",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §2255",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "June 2002- Incident 2",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "27. Approximately one week after the first incident, received a telephone call from JEFFREY EPSTEIN requesting that she return to his residence. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed to undress to her brassiere and underwear and to provide him with a massage. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated himself in presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 for this encounter.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "9",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015194",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "JEFFREY EPSTEIN"
- ],
- "organizations": [],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "June 2002"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "DOJ-OGR-00015194"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a legal complaint with redactions. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The redactions suggest sensitive information has been removed."
- }
|