| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "12",
- "document_number": "741",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 106\nLBTVMAX1\n1\nMS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2\nI just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating\n3\nstrikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not\n4\nsure.\n5\nTHE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the\n6\ndefense should start.\n7\nMS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till\n8\nwe get to the one and one and one.\n9\nTHE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?\n10\nMS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your\n11\nHonor.\n12\nTHE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;\n13\ngovernment is one; defense, two; government, one.\n14\nMS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.\n15\nTHE COURT: That's fine.\n16\nMS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.\n17\nTHE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I\n18\ndon't do alternating strikes.\n19\nMS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --\n20\nTHE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides\n21\nto do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the\n22\ndefense goes, or you could do what you proposed.\n23\nMS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical\n24\nway.\n25\nMS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016122",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 106",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "LBTVMAX1",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016122",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1\nMS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2\nI just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating\n3\nstrikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not\n4\nsure.\n5\nTHE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the\n6\ndefense should start.\n7\nMS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till\n8\nwe get to the one and one and one.\n9\nTHE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?\n10\nMS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your\n11\nHonor.\n12\nTHE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;\n13\ngovernment is one; defense, two; government, one.\n14\nMS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.\n15\nTHE COURT: That's fine.\n16\nMS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.\n17\nTHE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I\n18\ndon't do alternating strikes.\n19\nMS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --\n20\nTHE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides\n21\nto do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the\n22\ndefense goes, or you could do what you proposed.\n23\nMS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical\n24\nway.\n25\nMS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.",
- "position": "main content"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "MS. STERNHEIM",
- "THE COURT",
- "MS. COMEY"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
- "741",
- "DOJ-OGR-00016122"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|