DOJ-OGR-00016122.json 3.6 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "12",
  4. "document_number": "741",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 106\nLBTVMAX1\n1\nMS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2\nI just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating\n3\nstrikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not\n4\nsure.\n5\nTHE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the\n6\ndefense should start.\n7\nMS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till\n8\nwe get to the one and one and one.\n9\nTHE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?\n10\nMS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your\n11\nHonor.\n12\nTHE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;\n13\ngovernment is one; defense, two; government, one.\n14\nMS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.\n15\nTHE COURT: That's fine.\n16\nMS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.\n17\nTHE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I\n18\ndon't do alternating strikes.\n19\nMS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --\n20\nTHE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides\n21\nto do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the\n22\ndefense goes, or you could do what you proposed.\n23\nMS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical\n24\nway.\n25\nMS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016122",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 106",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LBTVMAX1",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016122",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "1\nMS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2\nI just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating\n3\nstrikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not\n4\nsure.\n5\nTHE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the\n6\ndefense should start.\n7\nMS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till\n8\nwe get to the one and one and one.\n9\nTHE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?\n10\nMS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your\n11\nHonor.\n12\nTHE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;\n13\ngovernment is one; defense, two; government, one.\n14\nMS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.\n15\nTHE COURT: That's fine.\n16\nMS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.\n17\nTHE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I\n18\ndon't do alternating strikes.\n19\nMS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --\n20\nTHE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides\n21\nto do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the\n22\ndefense goes, or you could do what you proposed.\n23\nMS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical\n24\nway.\n25\nMS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.",
  35. "position": "main content"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "MS. STERNHEIM",
  41. "THE COURT",
  42. "MS. COMEY"
  43. ],
  44. "organizations": [
  45. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  46. ],
  47. "locations": [],
  48. "dates": [
  49. "08/10/22"
  50. ],
  51. "reference_numbers": [
  52. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  53. "741",
  54. "DOJ-OGR-00016122"
  55. ]
  56. },
  57. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  58. }