mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016192.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "82 of 106",
    "document_number": "741",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 82 of 106 95 LBTCMAX4 Visoski - direct\n\n1 MR. EVERDELL: No objection.\n2 THE COURT: Without objection, Government Exhibit 111 is admitted. You may publish.\n3 (Government's Exhibit 111 received in evidence)\n4 MS. COMEY: Thank you. Ms. Drescher, I'd ask that we please publish this. And we can take that down. Thank you,\n5 Ms. Drescher.\n6 BY MS. COMEY:\n7 Q. Mr. Visoski, you mentioned that Ms. Maxwell worked for Mr. Epstein between approximately 1994 and 2004. Based on your\n8 observations of Ms. Maxwell, what was her role as an employee for Mr. Epstein?\n9 A. She managed the households. She was involved, to my knowledge, in decorating, hiring household staff. During that time\n10 period, Mr. Epstein was quite -- was acquiring quite a lot of residences and quite large residences. So it took a lot to\n11 undertake of managing and hiring and decorating, et cetera.\n12 Q. Focusing on the period between 1994 and 2004, how would Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Epstein, or another assistant let you know\n13 about an upcoming flight for one of Mr. Epstein's planes?\n14 A. Since you're going back so far in the '94s, I believe that was before cellphones even. So when I first got hired, we were\n15 issued pagers, and at that point, the office would page us and we would call in for the message. Then I guess later on in the\n16 '90s when cellphones came to be, we were issued cellphones or I\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016192",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 82 of 106 95 LBTCMAX4 Visoski - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. EVERDELL: No objection. THE COURT: Without objection, Government Exhibit 111 is admitted. You may publish. (Government's Exhibit 111 received in evidence) MS. COMEY: Thank you. Ms. Drescher, I'd ask that we please publish this. And we can take that down. Thank you, Ms. Drescher. BY MS. COMEY: Q. Mr. Visoski, you mentioned that Ms. Maxwell worked for Mr. Epstein between approximately 1994 and 2004. Based on your observations of Ms. Maxwell, what was her role as an employee for Mr. Epstein? A. She managed the households. She was involved, to my knowledge, in decorating, hiring household staff. During that time period, Mr. Epstein was quite -- was acquiring quite a lot of residences and quite large residences. So it took a lot to undertake of managing and hiring and decorating, et cetera. Q. Focusing on the period between 1994 and 2004, how would Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Epstein, or another assistant let you know about an upcoming flight for one of Mr. Epstein's planes? A. Since you're going back so far in the '94s, I believe that was before cellphones even. So when I first got hired, we were issued pagers, and at that point, the office would page us and we would call in for the message. Then I guess later on in the '90s when cellphones came to be, we were issued cellphones or I",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016192",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "Ms. Drescher",
      "Mr. Visoski",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Mr. Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "1994",
      "2004"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "741",
      "111",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016192"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}