DOJ-OGR-00016193.json 3.9 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "83",
  4. "document_number": "741",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 83 of 106\nLBTCMAX4\nVisoski - direct\n1 was issued a cellphone.\nQ. During that same period between 1994 and 2004, how much notice would you typically receive before a flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes?\nA. It was typically short notice. It could be a day notice. Probably -- a day notice at least, sometimes shorter notice, but it was -- it was short notice.\nQ. Again, focusing on that same period between 1994 and 2004, based on your observations of Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein, did they appear to have a personal relationship?\nA. From what I could see, I thought it was more personal than business, yes.\nQ. What did you observe, for example, that gave you that impression?\nA. I guess it's the way you would talk to another person if you were closer. It was more of a smalltalk as far as thinking that they were together as opposed to, you know, boss or not. But it was just a conversation that I saw, really.\nQ. About how long did that romantic relationship last from what you observed?\nA. It probably went to the 2000s. Yeah, about the 2000s. I wouldn't even categorize romantic, but more couplish than anything else. I don't think I ever witnessed them kiss or hold hands kind of thing.\nQ. To your knowledge, did Mr. Epstein only fly by private\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016193",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 83 of 106",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LBTCMAX4\nVisoski - direct",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 was issued a cellphone.\nQ. During that same period between 1994 and 2004, how much notice would you typically receive before a flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes?\nA. It was typically short notice. It could be a day notice. Probably -- a day notice at least, sometimes shorter notice, but it was -- it was short notice.\nQ. Again, focusing on that same period between 1994 and 2004, based on your observations of Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein, did they appear to have a personal relationship?\nA. From what I could see, I thought it was more personal than business, yes.\nQ. What did you observe, for example, that gave you that impression?\nA. I guess it's the way you would talk to another person if you were closer. It was more of a smalltalk as far as thinking that they were together as opposed to, you know, boss or not. But it was just a conversation that I saw, really.\nQ. About how long did that romantic relationship last from what you observed?\nA. It probably went to the 2000s. Yeah, about the 2000s. I wouldn't even categorize romantic, but more couplish than anything else. I don't think I ever witnessed them kiss or hold hands kind of thing.\nQ. To your knowledge, did Mr. Epstein only fly by private",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016193",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Mr. Epstein",
  41. "Ms. Maxwell",
  42. "Visoski"
  43. ],
  44. "organizations": [
  45. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  46. ],
  47. "locations": [],
  48. "dates": [
  49. "1994",
  50. "2004",
  51. "08/10/22",
  52. "2000s"
  53. ],
  54. "reference_numbers": [
  55. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  56. "741",
  57. "DOJ-OGR-00016193"
  58. ]
  59. },
  60. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  61. }