mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016470.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "254",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 254 of 267 2282 LCAVMAX8\n1 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. I think the conferral should work out. I'm confident we can reach some agreement on this.\n2 THE COURT: That's fine. And authority and support.\n3 Obviously I was not -- I broke no ground in permitting anonymity with respect to the witnesses who have testified. As I said, that that ruling, that's well-tread territory. Even if there's agreement, I would look for authority to make sure that it's permissible.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor.\n5 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. We'll look into the issue. I don't know who the witnesses are, what the basis would be, but we'll thoroughly examine it and make sure to apprise the Court whether there's a basis or not. We'll certainly address that in our briefing.\n6 With respect to those defense witnesses or, I should say, all of the defense witnesses, we just want to confirm that they will also be subject to Rule 615, your Honor.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: None of them have any plans to stay in the courtroom, your Honor, as far as we know. They are going to be in and out.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n10 THE COURT: Okay. Yes.\n11 MS. MENNINGER: Very briefly, your Honor. This is\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016470",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 254 of 267 2282 LCAVMAX8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. I think the conferral should work out. I'm confident we can reach some agreement on this.\n2 THE COURT: That's fine. And authority and support.\n3 Obviously I was not -- I broke no ground in permitting anonymity with respect to the witnesses who have testified. As I said, that that ruling, that's well-tread territory. Even if there's agreement, I would look for authority to make sure that it's permissible.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor.\n5 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. We'll look into the issue. I don't know who the witnesses are, what the basis would be, but we'll thoroughly examine it and make sure to apprise the Court whether there's a basis or not. We'll certainly address that in our briefing.\n6 With respect to those defense witnesses or, I should say, all of the defense witnesses, we just want to confirm that they will also be subject to Rule 615, your Honor.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: None of them have any plans to stay in the courtroom, your Honor, as far as we know. They are going to be in and out.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n10 THE COURT: Okay. Yes.\n11 MS. MENNINGER: Very briefly, your Honor. This is",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016470",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "THE COURT",
      "MS. MOE",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016470"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}