mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016760.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "31",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 31 of 197 LCFCmax1 2572\n\n1    investigation. I just want to make clear that she be called as\n2    a witness who's associated with an adverse party. So I intend\n3    to use leading questions under rule 611(c).\n4        THE COURT: I always encourage you to try -- you begin\n5    with direct and if she becomes adversarial, truth comes out in\n6    direct questions, but if you're not getting response to the\n7    answers or you're getting somewhat responsive answers but it's\n8    delaying, I'll take the application.\n9        Ms. Comey, did you have something?\n10       MS. COMEY: I just wanted to note, your Honor, that my\n11   understanding of Agent Young's testimony is that it's going to\n12   be about the prior inconsistent statements of Jane that your\n13   Honor has ruled are admissible. I don't imagine that much\n14   leading will be necessary for that.\n15       MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I intend to go into other\n16   aspects with Special Agent Young.\n17       THE COURT: Like what?\n18       MR. EVERDELL: Well, I believe, under your Honor's\n19   ruling, I'm allowed to inquire about the absence of evidence,\n20   and there is an absence of evidence in this case.\n21       THE COURT: Give me an example question.\n22       MR. EVERDELL: Well, there is no emails from the\n23   1990s, there is no geo location. I want to make that clear for\n24   the jury, these are all things that I think jurors in the\n25   modern era would expect, and there is none here, given the age\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00016760",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 31 of 197 LCFCmax1 2572",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    investigation. I just want to make clear that she be called as\n2    a witness who's associated with an adverse party. So I intend\n3    to use leading questions under rule 611(c).\n4        THE COURT: I always encourage you to try -- you begin\n5    with direct and if she becomes adversarial, truth comes out in\n6    direct questions, but if you're not getting response to the\n7    answers or you're getting somewhat responsive answers but it's\n8    delaying, I'll take the application.\n9        Ms. Comey, did you have something?\n10       MS. COMEY: I just wanted to note, your Honor, that my\n11   understanding of Agent Young's testimony is that it's going to\n12   be about the prior inconsistent statements of Jane that your\n13   Honor has ruled are admissible. I don't imagine that much\n14   leading will be necessary for that.\n15       MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I intend to go into other\n16   aspects with Special Agent Young.\n17       THE COURT: Like what?\n18       MR. EVERDELL: Well, I believe, under your Honor's\n19   ruling, I'm allowed to inquire about the absence of evidence,\n20   and there is an absence of evidence in this case.\n21       THE COURT: Give me an example question.\n22       MR. EVERDELL: Well, there is no emails from the\n23   1990s, there is no geo location. I want to make that clear for\n24   the jury, these are all things that I think jurors in the\n25   modern era would expect, and there is none here, given the age",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016760",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Comey",
      "Agent Young",
      "Jane",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "1990s"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016760"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}