mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016777.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "48",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 48 of 197 2589 LCHVMAX2 there were thousands of photographs seized, and that there was only obviously a subset that was presented to the jury. MS. MENNINGER: Right. Ms. Meder only was speaking to photographs, your Honor, not to the number of devices. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I would note that that was a situation where we called a witness affirmatively in our case to talk about photographic evidence that was seized; and then the defense properly cross-examined that witness about that evidence. What the defense is now suggesting they should be able to do is bring in a whole host of other investigative steps. There was Mr. Flatley, who testified about extraction from a single hard drive. I believe what Mr. Everdell is talking about is all of the other devices that were seized throughout the course of this investigation. And I think that that would be in violation of the Court's order. It would also be extremely confusing, because when we're talking about this investigation, it's a little ambiguous what we're talking about, as we alluded to earlier. This investigation was broader than just what resulted in these charges. MS. MENNINGER: Well, your Honor, there was a search that the government elicited information about that occurred in 2019 of our alleged co-conspirator's home. The question can be phrased because they -- THE COURT: Which witness was that? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016777",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 48 of 197 2589 LCHVMAX2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "there were thousands of photographs seized, and that there was only obviously a subset that was presented to the jury. MS. MENNINGER: Right. Ms. Meder only was speaking to photographs, your Honor, not to the number of devices. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I would note that that was a situation where we called a witness affirmatively in our case to talk about photographic evidence that was seized; and then the defense properly cross-examined that witness about that evidence. What the defense is now suggesting they should be able to do is bring in a whole host of other investigative steps. There was Mr. Flatley, who testified about extraction from a single hard drive. I believe what Mr. Everdell is talking about is all of the other devices that were seized throughout the course of this investigation. And I think that that would be in violation of the Court's order. It would also be extremely confusing, because when we're talking about this investigation, it's a little ambiguous what we're talking about, as we alluded to earlier. This investigation was broader than just what resulted in these charges. MS. MENNINGER: Well, your Honor, there was a search that the government elicited information about that occurred in 2019 of our alleged co-conspirator's home. The question can be phrased because they -- THE COURT: Which witness was that?",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016777",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MS. MEDER",
      "MR. FLATLEY",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "2019"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016777",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}