mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016811.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "82",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 82 of 197\nLCHCmax3 Young - cross\n1 MS. MENNINGER: Objection. Beyond the scope, your\n2 Honor.\n3 THE COURT: Sustained.\n4 Q. Who was present in the room for interviews with Jane?\n5 A. Her attorneys and Assistant United States Attorneys,\n6 myself, my partner. In the initial interviews, it was a larger\n7 group. Later, in later interviews, we condensed it down to\n8 myself and another AUSA.\n9 Q. And in your more recent interviews with Jane, who was in\n10 the room?\n11 MS. MENNINGER: Objection, your Honor. Beyond the\n12 scope. I didn't ask about recent ones.\n13 THE COURT: Sustained.\n14 Q. I think you already addressed this a little bit on direct,\n15 but just to be clear, are the reports that were read into the\n16 record just now verbatim?\n17 A. No.\n18 Q. Are they transcripts?\n19 A. No.\n20 Q. What are they?\n21 A. They're a summary of the interview with Jane.\n22 Q. Did you ever ask Jane to review your reports to confirm\n23 they were accurate?\n24 A. No.\n25 Q. To your knowledge, was Jane ever shown those reports before\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016811",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 82 of 197",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCHCmax3 Young - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MENNINGER: Objection. Beyond the scope, your\n2 Honor.\n3 THE COURT: Sustained.\n4 Q. Who was present in the room for interviews with Jane?\n5 A. Her attorneys and Assistant United States Attorneys,\n6 myself, my partner. In the initial interviews, it was a larger\n7 group. Later, in later interviews, we condensed it down to\n8 myself and another AUSA.\n9 Q. And in your more recent interviews with Jane, who was in\n10 the room?\n11 MS. MENNINGER: Objection, your Honor. Beyond the\n12 scope. I didn't ask about recent ones.\n13 THE COURT: Sustained.\n14 Q. I think you already addressed this a little bit on direct,\n15 but just to be clear, are the reports that were read into the\n16 record just now verbatim?\n17 A. No.\n18 Q. Are they transcripts?\n19 A. No.\n20 Q. What are they?\n21 A. They're a summary of the interview with Jane.\n22 Q. Did you ever ask Jane to review your reports to confirm\n23 they were accurate?\n24 A. No.\n25 Q. To your knowledge, was Jane ever shown those reports before",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016811",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "THE COURT",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "United States Attorneys"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016811"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}