mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016813.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "84",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 84 of 197 2625 LCHCmax3 Young - cross 1 (At the sidebar) 2 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I'm transitioning entirely 3 away from where we were at the prior sidebar. I was about to 4 switch to eliciting some prior consistent statements of Jane's. 5 I do believe the door has been opened for that, but I 6 understand defense counsel would object as beyond the scope. 7 But for efficiency purposes, I was going to ask her now while 8 she's on the stand about these prior consistent statements. 9 MS. MENNINGER: I mean, your Honor, opening the door 10 to prior consistent statements in this manner will then, on 11 recross, I think open the door to any number of other prior 12 inconsistent statements that your Honor just ruled out, and we 13 had to go through an entire process to get in the very few 14 prior inconsistent statements we did. The government hasn't 15 even told us now which prior consistent statement that they're 16 offering. 17 THE COURT: Rebuttal if it's beyond the scope. So 18 sustained with the opportunity to confer if they want to recall 19 the witness for rebuttal. 20 (Continued on next page) 21 22 23 24 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016813",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 84 of 197 2625",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCHCmax3 Young - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(At the sidebar) MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I'm transitioning entirely away from where we were at the prior sidebar. I was about to switch to eliciting some prior consistent statements of Jane's. I do believe the door has been opened for that, but I understand defense counsel would object as beyond the scope. But for efficiency purposes, I was going to ask her now while she's on the stand about these prior consistent statements. MS. MENNINGER: I mean, your Honor, opening the door to prior consistent statements in this manner will then, on recross, I think open the door to any number of other prior inconsistent statements that your Honor just ruled out, and we had to go through an entire process to get in the very few prior inconsistent statements we did. The government hasn't even told us now which prior consistent statement that they're offering. THE COURT: Rebuttal if it's beyond the scope. So sustained with the opportunity to confer if they want to recall the witness for rebuttal. (Continued on next page)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016813",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016813"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}