DOJ-OGR-00016946.json 3.7 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "20",
  4. "document_number": "765",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 20 of 95 2758 LCI1MAX1 used, and if that's not the Court's opinion, then -- THE COURT: I'm just asking if you have any legal support for that principle. MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, one good reason to think that coercion does not involve force is that the sex trafficking statute includes criminal activity by force, fraud, or coercion, and in that statute, \"force\" and \"coercion\" carry different meanings. THE COURT: Okay. I'm going to overrule the objection. So that will remain. Next page, Mr. Everdell. MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. Before I get to the next page, just for purposes of clarity, if the Court overrules a proposed edit, I would still note that I have that same proposal going through my changes. I just won't reiterate it. But I would like to just preserve those, preserve my suggestions, similar ones in similar charges. THE COURT: So you would repeat your request to remove \"coercion\" from every instance, so that is preserved. MR. EVERDELL: Correct, your Honor. All right. So we can go to page 20 now, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. MR. EVERDELL: All right. So on this one, your Honor, I understand, we're talking about the substantive count, and I do understand that because the way the charge is organized and SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016946",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 20 of 95 2758 LCI1MAX1",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "used, and if that's not the Court's opinion, then -- THE COURT: I'm just asking if you have any legal support for that principle. MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, one good reason to think that coercion does not involve force is that the sex trafficking statute includes criminal activity by force, fraud, or coercion, and in that statute, \"force\" and \"coercion\" carry different meanings. THE COURT: Okay. I'm going to overrule the objection. So that will remain. Next page, Mr. Everdell. MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. Before I get to the next page, just for purposes of clarity, if the Court overrules a proposed edit, I would still note that I have that same proposal going through my changes. I just won't reiterate it. But I would like to just preserve those, preserve my suggestions, similar ones in similar charges. THE COURT: So you would repeat your request to remove \"coercion\" from every instance, so that is preserved. MR. EVERDELL: Correct, your Honor. All right. So we can go to page 20 now, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. MR. EVERDELL: All right. So on this one, your Honor, I understand, we're talking about the substantive count, and I do understand that because the way the charge is organized and",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016946",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MR. ROHRBACH",
  36. "MR. EVERDELL"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [
  39. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  40. ],
  41. "locations": [],
  42. "dates": [
  43. "08/10/22"
  44. ],
  45. "reference_numbers": [
  46. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  47. "765",
  48. "DOJ-OGR-00016946"
  49. ]
  50. },
  51. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  52. }