mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016949.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "23",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 23 of 95\nLCI1MAX1\n1 usefulness of line 11, which states expressly Count Two, and\n2 I'll add, \"Count Two relates solely to Jane during the time period 1994 to 1997,\" for the reason indicated. Because the conspiracy count requires looking back to the substantive count for the object of the conspiracy.\n3\n4\n5\n6 I won't adopt the requested change within the statement of the elements.\n7\n8 Anything else on page 20?\n9\n10 MR. EVERDELL: With the addition of solely, your Honor, on line 11, there is just, on line 7, another \"or foreign\" that we need to omit.\n11\n12 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. So from the second element, page 20, line 7, the sentence that begins with\n13 \"Second,\" cutting \"or foreign.\" Okay.\n14\n15 MR. EVERDELL: Page 21, your Honor. On line 4, I'll just reiterate, I understand this has been overruled by the Court but we would propose replacing \"an individual\" with the word \"Jane.\" On line 5, there is \"or foreign,\" which should be omitted.\n16\n17\n18\n19 THE COURT: Thank you. Page 21, line 5, \"to travel in interstate commerce,\" cutting \"or foreign.\"\n20\n21\n22 Okay.\n23 MR. EVERDELL: On line 6 we would just reiterate our objection to the word \"coerced.\" I understand that's been overruled. But then, your Honor, generally I would say the\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016949",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 23 of 95",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCI1MAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 usefulness of line 11, which states expressly Count Two, and\n2 I'll add, \"Count Two relates solely to Jane during the time period 1994 to 1997,\" for the reason indicated. Because the conspiracy count requires looking back to the substantive count for the object of the conspiracy.\n3\n4\n5\n6 I won't adopt the requested change within the statement of the elements.\n7\n8 Anything else on page 20?\n9\n10 MR. EVERDELL: With the addition of solely, your Honor, on line 11, there is just, on line 7, another \"or foreign\" that we need to omit.\n11\n12 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. So from the second element, page 20, line 7, the sentence that begins with\n13 \"Second,\" cutting \"or foreign.\" Okay.\n14\n15 MR. EVERDELL: Page 21, your Honor. On line 4, I'll just reiterate, I understand this has been overruled by the Court but we would propose replacing \"an individual\" with the word \"Jane.\" On line 5, there is \"or foreign,\" which should be omitted.\n16\n17\n18\n19 THE COURT: Thank you. Page 21, line 5, \"to travel in interstate commerce,\" cutting \"or foreign.\"\n20\n21\n22 Okay.\n23 MR. EVERDELL: On line 6 we would just reiterate our objection to the word \"coerced.\" I understand that's been overruled. But then, your Honor, generally I would say the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016949",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "1994",
      "1997",
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "765",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016949"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}