mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016971.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "45",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 45 of 95 2783 LCI1MAX1\nhappens. But we will double-check it. Thank you.\nOkay. What's next, Mr. Everdell?\nMR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, just page 28, to preserve our suggestion, we would request to substitute the Miller charge. We understand that's been overruled. Lines 11 to 17.\nTHE COURT: Okay.\nMR. EVERDELL: Then I think we can skip to page 32.\nTHE COURT: That was your first one, right, Mr. Rohrbach?\nMR. ROHRBACH: It was, although, your Honor, we have, in the course of our conversations, resolved that, so the government has no -- our next edit, our next request, is on page 69, actually.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Page 32, Mr. Everdell.\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, still on 32 for the defense. We request on line 10, \"This count relates solely to Carolyn.\"\nMR. ROHRBACH: No objection.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Thank you. We'll make that change. Instruction No. 25, line 10, \"This count relates,\" adding the word \"solely,\" \"to Carolyn.\"\nAll right. Mr. Everdell, next page.\nMR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: My clerk notes that we have \"Minor\" in the heading of all the Count Six --\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016971",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 45 of 95 2783 LCI1MAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016971",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "happens. But we will double-check it. Thank you.\nOkay. What's next, Mr. Everdell?\nMR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, just page 28, to preserve our suggestion, we would request to substitute the Miller charge. We understand that's been overruled. Lines 11 to 17.\nTHE COURT: Okay.\nMR. EVERDELL: Then I think we can skip to page 32.\nTHE COURT: That was your first one, right, Mr. Rohrbach?\nMR. ROHRBACH: It was, although, your Honor, we have, in the course of our conversations, resolved that, so the government has no -- our next edit, our next request, is on page 69, actually.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Page 32, Mr. Everdell.\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, still on 32 for the defense. We request on line 10, \"This count relates solely to Carolyn.\"\nMR. ROHRBACH: No objection.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Thank you. We'll make that change. Instruction No. 25, line 10, \"This count relates,\" adding the word \"solely,\" \"to Carolyn.\"\nAll right. Mr. Everdell, next page.\nMR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: My clerk notes that we have \"Minor\" in the heading of all the Count Six --",
      "position": "main"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Everdell",
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Carolyn"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "765",
      "28",
      "32",
      "69",
      "25",
      "10",
      "Six",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016971"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}