DOJ-OGR-00016998.json 3.9 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "72",
  4. "document_number": "765",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 72 of 95 2810 LCIAMAX2ps\n1 I can read the full instruction.\n2 THE COURT: And the proposal is to include it where?\n3 MR. VERDELL: In instruction 44, in the credibility\n4 of witnesses.\n5 THE COURT: Right. Where?\n6 MR. VERDELL: I think it could be either after the\n7 second paragraph, before the third paragraph, or after the\n8 third paragraph, which goes on to the next page before the\n9 first full paragraph on that page.\n10 THE COURT: OK.\n11 MR. VERDELL: I'm happy to read it if you like, or\n12 you can just -- it's up to the Court.\n13 THE COURT: I don't have it yet. So go ahead.\n14 MR. VERDELL: OK. So the way it reads in Sand is,\n15 \"You have heard the testimony of a witness who was previously\n16 convicted of a crime punishable by more than one year in jail.\n17 This prior conviction was put into evidence for you to consider\n18 in evaluating the witness's credibility. You may consider that\n19 fact -- you may consider the fact that the witness who\n20 testified is a convicted felon in deciding how much of his\" --\n21 I think maybe \"his or her testimony to accept and what weight\n22 if any it should be given.\"\n23 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, we're not familiar with\n24 this instruction being given in this district, and obviously\n25 witnesses with felony convictions testify regularly. The\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016998",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 72 of 95 2810 LCIAMAX2ps",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 I can read the full instruction.\n2 THE COURT: And the proposal is to include it where?\n3 MR. VERDELL: In instruction 44, in the credibility\n4 of witnesses.\n5 THE COURT: Right. Where?\n6 MR. VERDELL: I think it could be either after the\n7 second paragraph, before the third paragraph, or after the\n8 third paragraph, which goes on to the next page before the\n9 first full paragraph on that page.\n10 THE COURT: OK.\n11 MR. VERDELL: I'm happy to read it if you like, or\n12 you can just -- it's up to the Court.\n13 THE COURT: I don't have it yet. So go ahead.\n14 MR. VERDELL: OK. So the way it reads in Sand is,\n15 \"You have heard the testimony of a witness who was previously\n16 convicted of a crime punishable by more than one year in jail.\n17 This prior conviction was put into evidence for you to consider\n18 in evaluating the witness's credibility. You may consider that\n19 fact -- you may consider the fact that the witness who\n20 testified is a convicted felon in deciding how much of his\" --\n21 I think maybe \"his or her testimony to accept and what weight\n22 if any it should be given.\"\n23 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, we're not familiar with\n24 this instruction being given in this district, and obviously\n25 witnesses with felony convictions testify regularly. The",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016998",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MR. VERDELL",
  36. "MR. ROHRBACH"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [
  39. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
  40. "DOJ"
  41. ],
  42. "locations": [],
  43. "dates": [
  44. "08/10/22"
  45. ],
  46. "reference_numbers": [
  47. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  48. "765",
  49. "DOJ-OGR-00016998"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about jury instructions. The text is mostly clear, but there are some minor formatting issues."
  53. }