mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017016.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "90 of 95",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 90 of 95 2828 LCIAMAX2ps\n\n1 paper exhibits that we were not able to show to the jury. So\n2 that's what might push it back two hours. So I would ask for\n3 the Court's indulgence to two and a half hours, in light of the\n4 fact that we really didn't get to show the jury all of the\n5 exhibits, and it's going to take more time to walk them through\n6 those exhibits that they haven't even seen.\n7 THE COURT: All right. So two and a half, and two and\n8 a half.\n9 MS. STERNHEIM: They should five minutes for rebuttal.\n10 And it will be fine.\n11 THE COURT: Can you do 30 for the rebuttal?\n12 MS. COMEY: I would ask for the Court's indulgence for\n13 a little more than 30 if I may, just to have a little bit of a\n14 cushion.\n15 THE COURT: All right. 35.\n16 MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor.\n17 THE COURT: So we're going to start at 9. We're going\n18 to do a very short midmorning break. We're going to do a short\n19 lunch. The jurors' lunch will be here, I think, 20 minutes.\n20 Let's say 30 minutes for you all to have lunch too. Given\n21 that, we should get through closings and the charge tomorrow\n22 and potentially they can start deliberating, depending on what\n23 time it is. But I agree --\n24 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, just on the issue of\n25 timing, thinking it through, so we start at 9, we start right\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 90 of 95 2828 LCIAMAX2ps",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 paper exhibits that we were not able to show to the jury. So\n2 that's what might push it back two hours. So I would ask for\n3 the Court's indulgence to two and a half hours, in light of the\n4 fact that we really didn't get to show the jury all of the\n5 exhibits, and it's going to take more time to walk them through\n6 those exhibits that they haven't even seen.\n7 THE COURT: All right. So two and a half, and two and\n8 a half.\n9 MS. STERNHEIM: They should five minutes for rebuttal.\n10 And it will be fine.\n11 THE COURT: Can you do 30 for the rebuttal?\n12 MS. COMEY: I would ask for the Court's indulgence for\n13 a little more than 30 if I may, just to have a little bit of a\n14 cushion.\n15 THE COURT: All right. 35.\n16 MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor.\n17 THE COURT: So we're going to start at 9. We're going\n18 to do a very short midmorning break. We're going to do a short\n19 lunch. The jurors' lunch will be here, I think, 20 minutes.\n20 Let's say 30 minutes for you all to have lunch too. Given\n21 that, we should get through closings and the charge tomorrow\n22 and potentially they can start deliberating, depending on what\n23 time it is. But I agree --\n24 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, just on the issue of\n25 timing, thinking it through, so we start at 9, we start right",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "tomorrow"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "765",
      "2828",
      "LCIAMAX2ps",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}