| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "91",
- "document_number": "765",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 91 of 95 2829 LCIAMAX2ps\n1 at 9 and the government has a two and a half hour closing, that\n2 puts us at 11:30, roughly, give or take. It would be the\n3 defense's request we don't break the defense closing through\n4 lunch. So I don't know how that impacts the schedule.\n5 THE COURT: We do the best we can, is what I always\n6 say.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: Understood.\n8 THE COURT: We'll see where we are. We'll adjust and\n9 try to not break anything.\n10 I'll have lunch here early, so that's a\n11 possibility.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: But, yes, I agree. And, you know, the\n14 charge, I think it was about 80 pages. My favorite part of the\n15 job is reading the charge.\n16 MS. STERNHEIM: And ours to listen.\n17 THE COURT: Nothing better. But I would guess an hour\n18 or so, we should get there.\n19 OK. And the other thing I have on my to-do list, I\n20 always have the parties agree on the exhibits that are going\n21 back to the jury, and I get that on the record, so forgive me\n22 that I'm not sure exactly where we are under COVID protocols.\n23 There was a time under COVID protocols where only electronic\n24 exhibits went back. I think, and Ms. Williams isn't here to\n25 tell me what's what, but I think now paper can go. Why don't\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017017",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 91 of 95 2829 LCIAMAX2ps",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 at 9 and the government has a two and a half hour closing, that\n2 puts us at 11:30, roughly, give or take. It would be the\n3 defense's request we don't break the defense closing through\n4 lunch. So I don't know how that impacts the schedule.\n5 THE COURT: We do the best we can, is what I always\n6 say.\n7 MR. EVERDELL: Understood.\n8 THE COURT: We'll see where we are. We'll adjust and\n9 try to not break anything.\n10 I'll have lunch here early, so that's a\n11 possibility.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: Thank you, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: But, yes, I agree. And, you know, the\n14 charge, I think it was about 80 pages. My favorite part of the\n15 job is reading the charge.\n16 MS. STERNHEIM: And ours to listen.\n17 THE COURT: Nothing better. But I would guess an hour\n18 or so, we should get there.\n19 OK. And the other thing I have on my to-do list, I\n20 always have the parties agree on the exhibits that are going\n21 back to the jury, and I get that on the record, so forgive me\n22 that I'm not sure exactly where we are under COVID protocols.\n23 There was a time under COVID protocols where only electronic\n24 exhibits went back. I think, and Ms. Williams isn't here to\n25 tell me what's what, but I think now paper can go. Why don't",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017017",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "MR. EVERDELL",
- "MS. STERNHEIM",
- "MS. WILLIAMS"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
- "765",
- "DOJ-OGR-00017017",
- "(212) 805-0300"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|