DOJ-OGR-00017092.json 4.7 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "71",
  4. "document_number": "767",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 257 2904\nLCKVMAX4\nSummation - Ms. Moe\n1 Her testimony was a total distraction. You saw the\n2 witnesses yourself. They were not talking about one time that\n3 they saw a fake car crash. They were telling you about how\n4 they were sexually abused again and again and again. You heard\n5 them tell you about their worst memories, and that's why this\n6 is a case about memory.\n7 As jurors, you understand how memory works from your\n8 own lives, and that's how you know it just doesn't make any\n9 sense to say that Jane and Annie and Carolyn and Kate all\n10 imagined this, or that they're experiencing some kind of false\n11 memory of something that never happened. Again and again at\n12 this trial you saw the lengths the defense went to in order to\n13 try to discredit the witnesses, because their testimony was\n14 devastating evidence of Maxwell's guilt.\n15 I want to talk about that for just a moment. Let's\n16 talk about just two examples.\n17 Remember that in a cross-examination of Jane, when the\n18 defense repeatedly tried to suggest that Jane had said on her\n19 application to Interlochen that nothing was difficult for her?\n20 This is Defense Exhibit J-3. This went on for question after\n21 question, as the defense tried to suggest that Jane was lying\n22 about her difficult home life. Here it is. The defense\n23 pointed her to the Interlochen application twice to suggest\n24 this. Here's part of the transcript where that happened.\n25 You wrote that. When asked about something difficult,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017092",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 257 2904",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LCKVMAX4\nSummation - Ms. Moe",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 Her testimony was a total distraction. You saw the\n2 witnesses yourself. They were not talking about one time that\n3 they saw a fake car crash. They were telling you about how\n4 they were sexually abused again and again and again. You heard\n5 them tell you about their worst memories, and that's why this\n6 is a case about memory.\n7 As jurors, you understand how memory works from your\n8 own lives, and that's how you know it just doesn't make any\n9 sense to say that Jane and Annie and Carolyn and Kate all\n10 imagined this, or that they're experiencing some kind of false\n11 memory of something that never happened. Again and again at\n12 this trial you saw the lengths the defense went to in order to\n13 try to discredit the witnesses, because their testimony was\n14 devastating evidence of Maxwell's guilt.\n15 I want to talk about that for just a moment. Let's\n16 talk about just two examples.\n17 Remember that in a cross-examination of Jane, when the\n18 defense repeatedly tried to suggest that Jane had said on her\n19 application to Interlochen that nothing was difficult for her?\n20 This is Defense Exhibit J-3. This went on for question after\n21 question, as the defense tried to suggest that Jane was lying\n22 about her difficult home life. Here it is. The defense\n23 pointed her to the Interlochen application twice to suggest\n24 this. Here's part of the transcript where that happened.\n25 You wrote that. When asked about something difficult,",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017092",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Jane",
  41. "Annie",
  42. "Carolyn",
  43. "Kate",
  44. "Maxwell",
  45. "Ms. Moe"
  46. ],
  47. "organizations": [
  48. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  49. ],
  50. "locations": [
  51. "Interlochen"
  52. ],
  53. "dates": [
  54. "08/10/22"
  55. ],
  56. "reference_numbers": [
  57. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  58. "767",
  59. "J-3",
  60. "DOJ-OGR-00017092"
  61. ]
  62. },
  63. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript from a trial involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The text discusses the testimony of witnesses and the defense's attempts to discredit them. The document is well-formatted and legible."
  64. }