mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017175.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "154",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 154 of 257 2988 LCKCmax7 Summation - Ms. Menninger to yourself based on the word of Carolyn? Would you hesitate to act in a matter of importance to yourself based on the word of Jane? Did they demonstrate to you that their stories were credible? I submit to you that they did not. All of these witnesses have changed their stories many times. Why? Was it a lack of memory? Was it a motivation to change their story? And each change of story should cause you to hesitate to act, and should evidence, the lack of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. There are many reasons to hesitate and many reasons to doubt. You have to use your common sense. Money is a powerful motivating factor. The time that has elapsed has made it very difficult for people to go back and reconstruct their memories, and their memories are highly flawed. How easy is it for someone to get on the stand and say, okay, well, I know I told you many times that I don't remember her being in the room, but now I do. It's pretty easy because no one is here to confront her. Epstein is dead. No one can say that they're lying except asking them questions and pointing out that their stories are not accurate. But Eva and Michelle came in and they told you they absolutely did not participate in sexual orgies that Jane said they did. That should make you hesitate about all of Jane's story. Carolyn swore many times to tell the truth, and all of SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00017175",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 154 of 257 2988 LCKCmax7 Summation - Ms. Menninger",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "to yourself based on the word of Carolyn? Would you hesitate to act in a matter of importance to yourself based on the word of Jane? Did they demonstrate to you that their stories were credible? I submit to you that they did not. All of these witnesses have changed their stories many times. Why? Was it a lack of memory? Was it a motivation to change their story? And each change of story should cause you to hesitate to act, and should evidence, the lack of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. There are many reasons to hesitate and many reasons to doubt. You have to use your common sense. Money is a powerful motivating factor. The time that has elapsed has made it very difficult for people to go back and reconstruct their memories, and their memories are highly flawed. How easy is it for someone to get on the stand and say, okay, well, I know I told you many times that I don't remember her being in the room, but now I do. It's pretty easy because no one is here to confront her. Epstein is dead. No one can say that they're lying except asking them questions and pointing out that their stories are not accurate. But Eva and Michelle came in and they told you they absolutely did not participate in sexual orgies that Jane said they did. That should make you hesitate about all of Jane's story. Carolyn swore many times to tell the truth, and all of",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017175",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Carolyn",
      "Jane",
      "Eva",
      "Michelle",
      "Epstein",
      "Ms. Menninger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017175"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript, likely from a criminal trial. The text is a summation by Ms. Menninger, discussing the credibility of witnesses and the reliability of their testimonies. The document is well-formatted and legible, with no apparent redactions or damage."
}