mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017248.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "227",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 227 of 257 3061\nLCKCmax9 Charge\nacts were done and statements were made in the defendant's absence and without her knowledge. However, before you may consider the statements or act of a coconspirator in deciding the issue of the defendant's guilt, you must first determine that the acts and statements were made during the existence and if in furtherance of the unlawful scheme. If the acts were done or the statements made by someone whom you do not find to have been a member of the conspiracy at the time of the acts or statements or if they were not done or said in furtherance of the conspiracy, they may not be considered by you as evidence against the defendant.\nInstruction No. 39: Conscious Avoidance.\nThis includes my instruction on the crimes charged in the indictment, but before I move on to my remaining instructions, I want to instruct you on the instruction of conscious avoidance.\nEach of the counts charged in the indictment requires the government to prove the defendant acted knowingly. As I've already defined that term, if a person is actually aware of a fact, then she knows that fact, but in determining whether the defendant acted knowingly, you may also consider whether the defendant deliberately closed her eyes to what otherwise would have been obvious.\nTo be clear, the necessary knowledge on the part of the defendant with respect to any particular charge cannot be\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017248",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 227 of 257 3061",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCKCmax9 Charge",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "acts were done and statements were made in the defendant's absence and without her knowledge. However, before you may consider the statements or act of a coconspirator in deciding the issue of the defendant's guilt, you must first determine that the acts and statements were made during the existence and if in furtherance of the unlawful scheme. If the acts were done or the statements made by someone whom you do not find to have been a member of the conspiracy at the time of the acts or statements or if they were not done or said in furtherance of the conspiracy, they may not be considered by you as evidence against the defendant.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Instruction No. 39: Conscious Avoidance.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "This includes my instruction on the crimes charged in the indictment, but before I move on to my remaining instructions, I want to instruct you on the instruction of conscious avoidance.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Each of the counts charged in the indictment requires the government to prove the defendant acted knowingly. As I've already defined that term, if a person is actually aware of a fact, then she knows that fact, but in determining whether the defendant acted knowingly, you may also consider whether the defendant deliberately closed her eyes to what otherwise would have been obvious.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "To be clear, the necessary knowledge on the part of the defendant with respect to any particular charge cannot be",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017248",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017248"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. The text is printed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document is from a court case with the reference number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE."
}