| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "230",
- "document_number": "767",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 230 of 257 3064 LCKCmax9 Charge\n\n1 Southern District of New York encompasses the following counties New York County, i.e., Manhattan, Bronx, Westchester,\n2 Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange, and Sullivan Counties.\n3 Anything that occurs in any of those places occurs in the Southern District of New York.\n4\n5 Venue must be examined separately for each count in the indictment. Venue on one count does not establish venue on another. If applicable, you may rely on the same evidence to establish evidence on multiple counts.\n6\n7 The government need not prove venue beyond a reasonable doubt, but only by a mere preponderance of the evidence. A preponderance of the evidence means more likely than not. Thus, the government, which does bear the burden of proving venue, has satisfied that if you conclude that it is more likely than not that some furtherance of each charged offense occurred in the Southern District of New York. If, on the other hand, you find that the government has failed to prove the venue requirement as to a particular offense, then you must acquit Ms. Maxwell of that offense even if all the other elements of the offense are proven.\n8\n9 Instruction No. 41: Time of Offense.\n10\n11 The indictment alleges that certain conduct occurred on or about various dates or during various time periods. It's not necessary, however, for the government to prove that any conduct alleged occurred exactly on such dates or throughout\n12\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00017251",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 230 of 257 3064 LCKCmax9 Charge",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 Southern District of New York encompasses the following counties New York County, i.e., Manhattan, Bronx, Westchester,\n2 Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange, and Sullivan Counties.\n3 Anything that occurs in any of those places occurs in the Southern District of New York.\n4\n5 Venue must be examined separately for each count in the indictment. Venue on one count does not establish venue on another. If applicable, you may rely on the same evidence to establish evidence on multiple counts.\n6\n7 The government need not prove venue beyond a reasonable doubt, but only by a mere preponderance of the evidence. A preponderance of the evidence means more likely than not. Thus, the government, which does bear the burden of proving venue, has satisfied that if you conclude that it is more likely than not that some furtherance of each charged offense occurred in the Southern District of New York. If, on the other hand, you find that the government has failed to prove the venue requirement as to a particular offense, then you must acquit Ms. Maxwell of that offense even if all the other elements of the offense are proven.\n8\n9 Instruction No. 41: Time of Offense.\n10\n11 The indictment alleges that certain conduct occurred on or about various dates or during various time periods. It's not necessary, however, for the government to prove that any conduct alleged occurred exactly on such dates or throughout\n12",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00017251",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Ms. Maxwell"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Southern District Reporters, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York",
- "Manhattan",
- "Bronx",
- "Westchester",
- "Rockland",
- "Putnam",
- "Dutchess",
- "Orange",
- "Sullivan Counties",
- "Southern District of New York"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "767",
- "DOJ-OGR-00017251"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving Ms. Maxwell. The text is printed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document includes a header with case information and a footer with the name and contact information of the court reporters."
- }
|