mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017258.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "237",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 237 of 257 3071\nLCKCmax9 Charge\n1 outcome of this case and any bias or prejudice of any such\n2 witness, and this is true regardless of who called or\n3 questioned the witness.\n4\n5 Finally, as you know, I have permitted certain\n6 witnesses to be referred to in open court either by their first\n7 name or a pseudonym. As I explained to you in my preliminary\n8 instructions before opening statements, this process is to\n9 protect the privacy of witnesses as this case has received\n10 significant attention in the media. I instruct you again that\n11 this process should not bear in any way on your evaluation of\n12 the evidence or credibility of any witness in this case.\n13 Instruction No. 45: Credibility of Witnesses -\n14 Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statement.\n15 You have heard evidence that a witness made a\n16 statement on an earlier occasion which counsel argues is\n17 inconsistent with the witness's trial testimony. Evidence of a\n18 prior inconsistent statement is not to be considered by you as\n19 affirmative evidence bearing on Ms. Maxwell's guilt. Evidence\n20 of the prior inconsistent statement was placed before you for\n21 the more limited purpose of helping you decide whether to\n22 believe the trial testimony of the witness who contradicted him\n23 or herself. If you find that the witness made an earlier\n24 statement that conflicts with his or her trial testimony, you\n25 may consider that fact in deciding how much of the trial\ntestimony, if any, to believe.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017258",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 237 of 257 3071",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCKCmax9 Charge",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 outcome of this case and any bias or prejudice of any such\n2 witness, and this is true regardless of who called or\n3 questioned the witness.\n4\n5 Finally, as you know, I have permitted certain\n6 witnesses to be referred to in open court either by their first\n7 name or a pseudonym. As I explained to you in my preliminary\n8 instructions before opening statements, this process is to\n9 protect the privacy of witnesses as this case has received\n10 significant attention in the media. I instruct you again that\n11 this process should not bear in any way on your evaluation of\n12 the evidence or credibility of any witness in this case.\n13 Instruction No. 45: Credibility of Witnesses -\n14 Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statement.\n15 You have heard evidence that a witness made a\n16 statement on an earlier occasion which counsel argues is\n17 inconsistent with the witness's trial testimony. Evidence of a\n18 prior inconsistent statement is not to be considered by you as\n19 affirmative evidence bearing on Ms. Maxwell's guilt. Evidence\n20 of the prior inconsistent statement was placed before you for\n21 the more limited purpose of helping you decide whether to\n22 believe the trial testimony of the witness who contradicted him\n23 or herself. If you find that the witness made an earlier\n24 statement that conflicts with his or her trial testimony, you\n25 may consider that fact in deciding how much of the trial\ntestimony, if any, to believe.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017258",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017258"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}