mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017259.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "238",
    "document_number": "767",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 257 3072 LCKCmax9 Charge\n\nIn making this determination, you may consider whether the witness purposefully made a false statement or whether it was an innocent mistake, whether the inconsistency concerns an important fact or whether it had to do with a small detail, whether the witness had an explanation for the inconsistency and whether the explanation appealed to your common sense.\n\nIt is exclusively your duty based on all the evidence and your own good judgment to determine whether the prior statement was inconsistent and, if so, how much, if any, weight to be given to the inconsistent statement in determining whether to believe all or part of the witness's testimony.\n\nInstruction No. 46: Law Enforcement and Government Employee Witnesses.\n\nYou have heard testimony from law enforcement officials and employees of the government. The fact that a witness may be employed by the federal government as a law enforcement official or employee does not mean that his or her testimony is necessarily deserving of more or less consideration or greater or less weight than that of an ordinary witness. In this context, defense counsel is allowed to try to attack the credibility of such a witness on the ground that his or her testimony may be colored by a personal or professional interest in the outcome of the case. It is your decision after reviewing all the evidence whether to accept the testimony of the law enforcement or government\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00017259",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 257 3072 LCKCmax9 Charge",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In making this determination, you may consider whether the witness purposefully made a false statement or whether it was an innocent mistake, whether the inconsistency concerns an important fact or whether it had to do with a small detail, whether the witness had an explanation for the inconsistency and whether the explanation appealed to your common sense.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "It is exclusively your duty based on all the evidence and your own good judgment to determine whether the prior statement was inconsistent and, if so, how much, if any, weight to be given to the inconsistent statement in determining whether to believe all or part of the witness's testimony.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Instruction No. 46: Law Enforcement and Government Employee Witnesses.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "You have heard testimony from law enforcement officials and employees of the government. The fact that a witness may be employed by the federal government as a law enforcement official or employee does not mean that his or her testimony is necessarily deserving of more or less consideration or greater or less weight than that of an ordinary witness. In this context, defense counsel is allowed to try to attack the credibility of such a witness on the ground that his or her testimony may be colored by a personal or professional interest in the outcome of the case. It is your decision after reviewing all the evidence whether to accept the testimony of the law enforcement or government",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00017259",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "federal government"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "767",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017259"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. The text is printed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document includes a header with case information and a footer with the name and contact information of the reporting agency."
}