mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017322.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "18",
    "document_number": "773",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 29 3135 LCRVMAXT\n\n1 MR. EVERDELL: Right?\n2 The travel back to a place where she is presumably not engaging in illicit sexual activity, that is not a significant or motivating purpose for that travel.\n3\n4 THE COURT: You didn't answer my question.\n5\n6 MR. EVERDELL: Maybe I'm confused by the question, your Honor.\n7\n8 THE COURT: To be found guilty on this count, must the jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's flight to New Mexico?\n9\n10 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I interject myself into this conversation?\n11\n12 THE COURT: If you answer the question, I would value it.\n13\n14 MS. MENNINGER: I will.\n15\n16 It has to be a place for which the travel was a significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity.\n17\n18 In this hypothetical that they've given in this question, they have a comma in two places. The first place they have a comma is after the return flight, comma, but not the flight to New Mexico, where the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, comma. So they have excluded out where they're hypothetically claiming that the flight to New Mexico was the place for which the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00017322",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 29 3135 LCRVMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MR. EVERDELL: Right?\n2 The travel back to a place where she is presumably not engaging in illicit sexual activity, that is not a significant or motivating purpose for that travel.\n3\n4 THE COURT: You didn't answer my question.\n5\n6 MR. EVERDELL: Maybe I'm confused by the question, your Honor.\n7\n8 THE COURT: To be found guilty on this count, must the jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's flight to New Mexico?\n9\n10 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I interject myself into this conversation?\n11\n12 THE COURT: If you answer the question, I would value it.\n13\n14 MS. MENNINGER: I will.\n15\n16 It has to be a place for which the travel was a significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity.\n17\n18 In this hypothetical that they've given in this question, they have a comma in two places. The first place they have a comma is after the return flight, comma, but not the flight to New Mexico, where the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, comma. So they have excluded out where they're hypothetically claiming that the flight to New Mexico was the place for which the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017322",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "JANE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "773",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017322"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}