mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017326.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "22 of 29",
    "document_number": "773",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 22 of 29 3139 LCRVMAXT\n\nwhich is the substantive transportation count, which, as we know, has to deal with the violation of New York law. And they are talking about flights to New Mexico; and can she be found guilty on the second element of Count Four regarding these flights to New Mexico.\n\nSo I think we may have to respond to the jury on that score as well, which is the fact that they have to be considering New York events for Count Four, rather than -- or violations of New York law, which wouldn't occur in New Mexico for there to be a conviction on Count Four.\n\nMS. MODE: Your Honor, I think that's exactly why we proposed directing the jurors to the entirety of the instruction, which says just that. The second paragraph of that same instruction reminds the jury, as the instruction does throughout, that we're talking about New York Penal Law, Section 130.55. And so I think our proposal remains the same that they be referred to the entirety of the instruction, which includes that language, among other aspects of this particular element.\n\nTHE COURT: Yes.\n\nMS. STERNHEIM: Judge, may I be heard for a moment?\n\nTHE COURT: Sure.\n\nMS. STERNHEIM: I think the fact that the jury has mentioned New Mexico regarding a count that pertains to New York is not just cleared up by referring them to the\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00017326",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 22 of 29 3139 LCRVMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "which is the substantive transportation count, which, as we know, has to deal with the violation of New York law. And they are talking about flights to New Mexico; and can she be found guilty on the second element of Count Four regarding these flights to New Mexico.\n\nSo I think we may have to respond to the jury on that score as well, which is the fact that they have to be considering New York events for Count Four, rather than -- or violations of New York law, which wouldn't occur in New Mexico for there to be a conviction on Count Four.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MODE: Your Honor, I think that's exactly why we proposed directing the jurors to the entirety of the instruction, which says just that. The second paragraph of that same instruction reminds the jury, as the instruction does throughout, that we're talking about New York Penal Law, Section 130.55. And so I think our proposal remains the same that they be referred to the entirety of the instruction, which includes that language, among other aspects of this particular element.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Yes.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, may I be heard for a moment?\n\nTHE COURT: Sure.\n\nMS. STERNHEIM: I think the fact that the jury has mentioned New Mexico regarding a count that pertains to New York is not just cleared up by referring them to the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017326",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MODE",
      "THE COURT",
      "MS. STERNHEIM"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 773",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017326"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about a legal case involving flights to New Mexico and violations of New York law. The transcript includes dialogue between the court and lawyers, and references specific legal codes and counts."
}