mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017356.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "7",
    "document_number": "777",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 777 Filed 08/10/22 Page 7 of 13 3173\nLCT1MAXT\n1 We have two prepared versions. Really, the dispute is over one set of redactions. I'm happy to pass that up to the Court with both the government's proposed redactions and the defense's proposed redactions and indicate where the dispute lies.\n2\n3\n4\n5 THE COURT: Okay. I'll hear from you.\n6\n7 I don't have the unredacted version right in front of me, so I see the difference in the redactions, but --\n8\n9 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor. I think the dispute is on page 2370, lines 14 to 18, and the government's view is the objection was to the whole question, that there had not been a predicate foundation to confirm a basis of knowledge,\n10\n11\n12 and so I think our view is the whole response should be redacted because the objection was sustained, and so I don't see how a partial answer --\n13\n14\n15\n16 THE COURT: I need the unredacted version. My law clerk is getting it for me.\n17\n18 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor.\n19 (Pause)\n20\n21 THE COURT: Right. So the issue here is that it's an answer that's being objected to and not a question. The answer has three parts to it. So the first part is, \"They just kind of went their separate ways.\" The question \"How so?\" is not objected to, so that stays, at the least. The answer, \"They just kind of went their separate ways.\" Seems like Ghislaine\n22\n23\n24\n25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00017356",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 777 Filed 08/10/22 Page 7 of 13 3173",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCT1MAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 We have two prepared versions. Really, the dispute is over one set of redactions. I'm happy to pass that up to the Court with both the government's proposed redactions and the defense's proposed redactions and indicate where the dispute lies.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Okay. I'll hear from you.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor. I think the dispute is on page 2370, lines 14 to 18, and the government's view is the objection was to the whole question, that there had not been a predicate foundation to confirm a basis of knowledge,",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: I need the unredacted version. My law clerk is getting it for me.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(Pause)",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Right. So the issue here is that it's an answer that's being objected to and not a question. The answer has three parts to it. So the first part is, \"They just kind of went their separate ways.\" The question \"How so?\" is not objected to, so that stays, at the least. The answer, \"They just kind of went their separate ways.\" Seems like Ghislaine",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017356",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "Ghislaine"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "777",
      "2370",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017356"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}